Skip to content

Conversation

@alice-i-cecile
Copy link
Member

@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile commented Oct 20, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@Jondolf Jondolf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These removals seem reasonable :)

I think ghost nodes should be mentioned as an experimental feature that the ecosystem can experiment with, but I agree that they probably shouldn't have their own dedicated section at this point. A brief mention in e.g. the "What's next?" section near UI improvements might be enough.

@alice-i-cecile
Copy link
Member Author

Yep, I think that ghost nodes go in what's next :)

@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile added S-Ready-For-Final-Review Ready for a maintainer to consider for merging and removed S-Needs-Review labels Oct 20, 2024
@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 20, 2024
Merged via the queue into bevyengine:main with commit 2511f11 Oct 20, 2024
10 checks passed
@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile deleted the less-release-notes branch October 20, 2024 17:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-Release-Notes C-Content S-Ready-For-Final-Review Ready for a maintainer to consider for merging

Projects

None yet

3 participants