there is something wrong in devicetree #84
Comments
crow-misia
pushed a commit
to crow-misia/linux
that referenced
this issue
Feb 1, 2019
[ Upstream commit 4f4b374 ] This is the much more correct fix for my earlier attempt at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/10/118 Short recap: - There's not actually a locking issue, it's just lockdep being a bit too eager to complain about a possible deadlock. - Contrary to what I claimed the real problem is recursion on kn->count. Greg pointed me at sysfs_break_active_protection(), used by the scsi subsystem to allow a sysfs file to unbind itself. That would be a real deadlock, which isn't what's happening here. Also, breaking the active protection means we'd need to manually handle all the lifetime fun. - With Rafael we discussed the task_work approach, which kinda works, but has two downsides: It's a functional change for a lockdep annotation issue, and it won't work for the bind file (which needs to get the errno from the driver load function back to userspace). - Greg also asked why this never showed up: To hit this you need to unregister a 2nd driver from the unload code of your first driver. I guess only gpus do that. The bug has always been there, but only with a recent patch series did we add more locks so that lockdep built a chain from unbinding the snd-hda driver to the acpi_video_unregister call. Full lockdep splat: [12301.898799] ============================================ [12301.898805] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [12301.898811] 4.20.0-rc7+ beagleboard#84 Not tainted [12301.898815] -------------------------------------------- [12301.898821] bash/5297 is trying to acquire lock: [12301.898826] 00000000f61c6093 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 [12301.898841] but task is already holding lock: [12301.898847] 000000005f634021 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190 [12301.898856] other info that might help us debug this: [12301.898862] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [12301.898867] CPU0 [12301.898870] ---- [12301.898874] lock(kn->count#39); [12301.898879] lock(kn->count#39); [12301.898883] *** DEADLOCK *** [12301.898891] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [12301.898899] 5 locks held by bash/5297: [12301.898903] #0: 00000000cd800e54 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x17f/0x1b0 [12301.898915] beagleboard#1: 000000000465e7c2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xd3/0x190 [12301.898925] beagleboard#2: 000000005f634021 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190 [12301.898936] beagleboard#3: 00000000414ef7ac (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x34/0x240 [12301.898950] beagleboard#4: 000000003218fbdf (register_count_mutex){+.+.}, at: acpi_video_unregister+0xe/0x40 [12301.898960] stack backtrace: [12301.898968] CPU: 1 PID: 5297 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.20.0-rc7+ beagleboard#84 [12301.898974] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook 8460p/161C, BIOS 68SCF Ver. F.01 03/11/2011 [12301.898982] Call Trace: [12301.898989] dump_stack+0x67/0x9b [12301.898997] __lock_acquire+0x6ad/0x1410 [12301.899003] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 [12301.899010] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [12301.899017] ? mutex_spin_on_owner+0xe4/0x150 [12301.899023] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [12301.899030] ? lock_acquire+0x90/0x180 [12301.899036] lock_acquire+0x90/0x180 [12301.899042] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 [12301.899049] __kernfs_remove+0x296/0x310 [12301.899055] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 [12301.899060] ? kernfs_name_hash+0xd/0x80 [12301.899066] ? kernfs_find_ns+0x6c/0x100 [12301.899073] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 [12301.899080] bus_remove_driver+0x92/0xa0 [12301.899085] acpi_video_unregister+0x24/0x40 [12301.899127] i915_driver_unload+0x42/0x130 [i915] [12301.899160] i915_pci_remove+0x19/0x30 [i915] [12301.899169] pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0 [12301.899176] device_release_driver_internal+0x185/0x240 [12301.899183] unbind_store+0xaf/0x180 [12301.899189] kernfs_fop_write+0x104/0x190 [12301.899195] __vfs_write+0x31/0x180 [12301.899203] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80 [12301.899209] ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x29/0x50 [12301.899216] ? __sb_start_write+0x13c/0x1a0 [12301.899221] ? vfs_write+0x17f/0x1b0 [12301.899227] vfs_write+0xb9/0x1b0 [12301.899233] ksys_write+0x50/0xc0 [12301.899239] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x180 [12301.899247] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [12301.899253] RIP: 0033:0x7f452ac7f7a4 [12301.899259] Code: 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 8b 05 aa f0 2c 00 48 63 ff 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 55 53 48 89 d5 48 89 f3 48 83 [12301.899273] RSP: 002b:00007ffceafa6918 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [12301.899282] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000d RCX: 00007f452ac7f7a4 [12301.899288] RDX: 000000000000000d RSI: 00005612a1abf7c0 RDI: 0000000000000001 [12301.899295] RBP: 00005612a1abf7c0 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00005612a1c46730 [12301.899301] R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000000d [12301.899308] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f452af4a740 R15: 000000000000000d Looking around I've noticed that usb and i2c already handle similar recursion problems, where a sysfs file can unbind the same type of sysfs somewhere else in the hierarchy. Relevant commits are: commit 356c05d Author: Alan Stern <[email protected]> Date: Mon May 14 13:30:03 2012 -0400 sysfs: get rid of some lockdep false positives commit e9b526f Author: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]> Date: Fri May 17 14:56:35 2013 +0200 i2c: suppress lockdep warning on delete_device Implement the same trick for driver bind/unbind. v2: Put the macro into bus.c (Greg). Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Cc: Ramalingam C <[email protected]> Cc: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> Cc: Heikki Krogerus <[email protected]> Cc: Vivek Gautam <[email protected]> Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
RobertCNelson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2019
[ Upstream commit 4f4b374 ] This is the much more correct fix for my earlier attempt at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/10/118 Short recap: - There's not actually a locking issue, it's just lockdep being a bit too eager to complain about a possible deadlock. - Contrary to what I claimed the real problem is recursion on kn->count. Greg pointed me at sysfs_break_active_protection(), used by the scsi subsystem to allow a sysfs file to unbind itself. That would be a real deadlock, which isn't what's happening here. Also, breaking the active protection means we'd need to manually handle all the lifetime fun. - With Rafael we discussed the task_work approach, which kinda works, but has two downsides: It's a functional change for a lockdep annotation issue, and it won't work for the bind file (which needs to get the errno from the driver load function back to userspace). - Greg also asked why this never showed up: To hit this you need to unregister a 2nd driver from the unload code of your first driver. I guess only gpus do that. The bug has always been there, but only with a recent patch series did we add more locks so that lockdep built a chain from unbinding the snd-hda driver to the acpi_video_unregister call. Full lockdep splat: [12301.898799] ============================================ [12301.898805] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [12301.898811] 4.20.0-rc7+ #84 Not tainted [12301.898815] -------------------------------------------- [12301.898821] bash/5297 is trying to acquire lock: [12301.898826] 00000000f61c6093 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 [12301.898841] but task is already holding lock: [12301.898847] 000000005f634021 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190 [12301.898856] other info that might help us debug this: [12301.898862] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [12301.898867] CPU0 [12301.898870] ---- [12301.898874] lock(kn->count#39); [12301.898879] lock(kn->count#39); [12301.898883] *** DEADLOCK *** [12301.898891] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [12301.898899] 5 locks held by bash/5297: [12301.898903] #0: 00000000cd800e54 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x17f/0x1b0 [12301.898915] #1: 000000000465e7c2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xd3/0x190 [12301.898925] #2: 000000005f634021 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190 [12301.898936] #3: 00000000414ef7ac (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x34/0x240 [12301.898950] #4: 000000003218fbdf (register_count_mutex){+.+.}, at: acpi_video_unregister+0xe/0x40 [12301.898960] stack backtrace: [12301.898968] CPU: 1 PID: 5297 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.20.0-rc7+ #84 [12301.898974] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook 8460p/161C, BIOS 68SCF Ver. F.01 03/11/2011 [12301.898982] Call Trace: [12301.898989] dump_stack+0x67/0x9b [12301.898997] __lock_acquire+0x6ad/0x1410 [12301.899003] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 [12301.899010] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [12301.899017] ? mutex_spin_on_owner+0xe4/0x150 [12301.899023] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [12301.899030] ? lock_acquire+0x90/0x180 [12301.899036] lock_acquire+0x90/0x180 [12301.899042] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 [12301.899049] __kernfs_remove+0x296/0x310 [12301.899055] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 [12301.899060] ? kernfs_name_hash+0xd/0x80 [12301.899066] ? kernfs_find_ns+0x6c/0x100 [12301.899073] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 [12301.899080] bus_remove_driver+0x92/0xa0 [12301.899085] acpi_video_unregister+0x24/0x40 [12301.899127] i915_driver_unload+0x42/0x130 [i915] [12301.899160] i915_pci_remove+0x19/0x30 [i915] [12301.899169] pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0 [12301.899176] device_release_driver_internal+0x185/0x240 [12301.899183] unbind_store+0xaf/0x180 [12301.899189] kernfs_fop_write+0x104/0x190 [12301.899195] __vfs_write+0x31/0x180 [12301.899203] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80 [12301.899209] ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x29/0x50 [12301.899216] ? __sb_start_write+0x13c/0x1a0 [12301.899221] ? vfs_write+0x17f/0x1b0 [12301.899227] vfs_write+0xb9/0x1b0 [12301.899233] ksys_write+0x50/0xc0 [12301.899239] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x180 [12301.899247] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [12301.899253] RIP: 0033:0x7f452ac7f7a4 [12301.899259] Code: 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 8b 05 aa f0 2c 00 48 63 ff 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 55 53 48 89 d5 48 89 f3 48 83 [12301.899273] RSP: 002b:00007ffceafa6918 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [12301.899282] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000d RCX: 00007f452ac7f7a4 [12301.899288] RDX: 000000000000000d RSI: 00005612a1abf7c0 RDI: 0000000000000001 [12301.899295] RBP: 00005612a1abf7c0 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00005612a1c46730 [12301.899301] R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000000d [12301.899308] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f452af4a740 R15: 000000000000000d Looking around I've noticed that usb and i2c already handle similar recursion problems, where a sysfs file can unbind the same type of sysfs somewhere else in the hierarchy. Relevant commits are: commit 356c05d Author: Alan Stern <[email protected]> Date: Mon May 14 13:30:03 2012 -0400 sysfs: get rid of some lockdep false positives commit e9b526f Author: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]> Date: Fri May 17 14:56:35 2013 +0200 i2c: suppress lockdep warning on delete_device Implement the same trick for driver bind/unbind. v2: Put the macro into bus.c (Greg). Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Cc: Ramalingam C <[email protected]> Cc: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> Cc: Heikki Krogerus <[email protected]> Cc: Vivek Gautam <[email protected]> Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
RobertCNelson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 4, 2024
[ Upstream commit 346f59d ] Many devices with a single alternate setting do not have a Valid Alternate Setting Control and validation performed by validate_sample_rate_table_v2v3() doesn't work on them and is not really needed. So check the presense of control before sending altsetting validation requests. MOTU Microbook IIc is suffering the most without this check. It takes up to 40 seconds to bootup due to how slow it switches sampling rates: [ 2659.164824] usb 3-2: New USB device found, idVendor=07fd, idProduct=0004, bcdDevice= 0.60 [ 2659.164827] usb 3-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 [ 2659.164829] usb 3-2: Product: MicroBook IIc [ 2659.164830] usb 3-2: Manufacturer: MOTU [ 2659.166204] usb 3-2: Found last interface = 3 [ 2679.322298] usb 3-2: No valid sample rate available for 1:1, assuming a firmware bug [ 2679.322306] usb 3-2: 1:1: add audio endpoint 0x3 [ 2679.322321] usb 3-2: Creating new data endpoint #3 [ 2679.322552] usb 3-2: 1:1 Set sample rate 96000, clock 1 [ 2684.362250] usb 3-2: 2:1: cannot get freq (v2/v3): err -110 [ 2694.444700] usb 3-2: No valid sample rate available for 2:1, assuming a firmware bug [ 2694.444707] usb 3-2: 2:1: add audio endpoint 0x84 [ 2694.444721] usb 3-2: Creating new data endpoint #84 [ 2699.482103] usb 3-2: 2:1 Set sample rate 96000, clock 1 Signed-off-by: Alexander Tsoy <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
RobertCNelson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 12, 2024
[ Upstream commit 346f59d ] Many devices with a single alternate setting do not have a Valid Alternate Setting Control and validation performed by validate_sample_rate_table_v2v3() doesn't work on them and is not really needed. So check the presense of control before sending altsetting validation requests. MOTU Microbook IIc is suffering the most without this check. It takes up to 40 seconds to bootup due to how slow it switches sampling rates: [ 2659.164824] usb 3-2: New USB device found, idVendor=07fd, idProduct=0004, bcdDevice= 0.60 [ 2659.164827] usb 3-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 [ 2659.164829] usb 3-2: Product: MicroBook IIc [ 2659.164830] usb 3-2: Manufacturer: MOTU [ 2659.166204] usb 3-2: Found last interface = 3 [ 2679.322298] usb 3-2: No valid sample rate available for 1:1, assuming a firmware bug [ 2679.322306] usb 3-2: 1:1: add audio endpoint 0x3 [ 2679.322321] usb 3-2: Creating new data endpoint #3 [ 2679.322552] usb 3-2: 1:1 Set sample rate 96000, clock 1 [ 2684.362250] usb 3-2: 2:1: cannot get freq (v2/v3): err -110 [ 2694.444700] usb 3-2: No valid sample rate available for 2:1, assuming a firmware bug [ 2694.444707] usb 3-2: 2:1: add audio endpoint 0x84 [ 2694.444721] usb 3-2: Creating new data endpoint #84 [ 2699.482103] usb 3-2: 2:1 Set sample rate 96000, clock 1 Signed-off-by: Alexander Tsoy <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
in linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
edma: edma@49000000 {
compatible = "ti,edma3-tpcc";
ti,hwmods = "tpcc";
reg = <0x49000000 0x10000>;
reg-names = "edma3_cc";
interrupts = <12 13 14>;
interrupt-names = "edma3_ccint", "emda3_mperr",
"edma3_ccerrint";
dma-requests = <64>;
#dma-cells = <2>;
ti,tptcs = <&edma_tptc0 7>, <&edma_tptc1 5>,
<&edma_tptc2 0>;
ti,edma-memcpy-channels = <20 21>;
};
0x10000 should be 0x100000
like edma_tptc0: tptc@49800000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: