Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#3981 - Model SDPR API #4018

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024
Merged

#3981 - Model SDPR API #4018

merged 10 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

andrepestana-aot
Copy link
Collaborator

@andrepestana-aot andrepestana-aot commented Dec 3, 2024

@andrepestana-aot andrepestana-aot changed the title initial commit #3981 - Model SDPR API Dec 3, 2024
@andrepestana-aot andrepestana-aot self-assigned this Dec 3, 2024
@andrepestana-aot andrepestana-aot marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2024 23:16
@Module({
imports: [AuthModule],
controllers: [StudentExternalController],
providers: [StudentService],
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Open for discussion but we can keep those services at the API scope at first.
We can create some specific services for the external module, but I am not sure if we should start creating them in the integrations lib directly.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dheepak-aot can you please collaborate on this?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with @andrewsignori-aot, current scope of the services that serve the external APIs can be in API scope.

Copy link
Collaborator

@andrewsignori-aot andrewsignori-aot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work, please take a look at the comments.

@lewischen-aot
Copy link
Collaborator

Just a minor comment. Great work so far. Please take a look at the remaining comments.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Backend Unit Tests Coverage Report

Totals Coverage
Statements: 22.04% ( 3753 / 17027 )
Methods: 10.12% ( 215 / 2125 )
Lines: 25.4% ( 3258 / 12829 )
Branches: 13.51% ( 280 / 2073 )

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2024

E2E Workflow Workers Coverage Report

Totals Coverage
Statements: 65.43% ( 583 / 891 )
Methods: 59.26% ( 64 / 108 )
Lines: 68.54% ( 464 / 677 )
Branches: 51.89% ( 55 / 106 )

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2024

E2E Queue Consumers Coverage Report

Totals Coverage
Statements: 84.03% ( 1284 / 1528 )
Methods: 81.65% ( 129 / 158 )
Lines: 85.62% ( 1084 / 1266 )
Branches: 68.27% ( 71 / 104 )

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2024

E2E SIMS API Coverage Report

Totals Coverage
Statements: 67.16% ( 5869 / 8739 )
Methods: 64.75% ( 722 / 1115 )
Lines: 71.15% ( 4612 / 6482 )
Branches: 46.85% ( 535 / 1142 )

Copy link
Collaborator

@andrewsignori-aot andrewsignori-aot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work, looks good 👍

Copy link
Collaborator

@lewischen-aot lewischen-aot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍 Thanks for making the changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants