Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[remote] Improve .netrc test in RemoteModuleTest #15902

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Yannic
Copy link
Contributor

@Yannic Yannic commented Jul 18, 2022

The return value being non-null doesn't assert that we actually parsed the (expected) .netrc.

The return value being non-null doesn't assert that we actually parsed the (expected) `.netrc`.
@Yannic Yannic requested a review from a team as a code owner July 18, 2022 10:24
@Yannic
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yannic commented Jul 18, 2022

Found this while working on #15856

@tjgq PTAL

@Yannic
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yannic commented Jul 18, 2022

@bazel-io flag

@bazel-io bazel-io added the potential release blocker Flagged by community members using "@bazel-io flag". Should be added to a release blocker milestone label Jul 18, 2022
@Yannic Yannic deleted the patch-7 branch July 18, 2022 12:15
@ShreeM01
Copy link
Contributor

@bazel-io fork 5.3.0

1 similar comment
@ckolli5
Copy link

ckolli5 commented Jul 18, 2022

@bazel-io fork 5.3.0

@bazel-io bazel-io removed the potential release blocker Flagged by community members using "@bazel-io flag". Should be added to a release blocker milestone label Jul 18, 2022
ckolli5 pushed a commit to ckolli5/bazel that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2022
The return value being non-null doesn't assert that we actually parsed the (expected) `.netrc`.

Closes bazelbuild#15902.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 461583660
Change-Id: I0cd9a56c79a2177d89f67e2c541f38eb0ca24dcb
sgowroji pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
The return value being non-null doesn't assert that we actually parsed the (expected) `.netrc`.

Closes #15902.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 461583660
Change-Id: I0cd9a56c79a2177d89f67e2c541f38eb0ca24dcb

Co-authored-by: Yannic <[email protected]>
aranguyen pushed a commit to aranguyen/bazel that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
The return value being non-null doesn't assert that we actually parsed the (expected) `.netrc`.

Closes bazelbuild#15902.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 461583660
Change-Id: I0cd9a56c79a2177d89f67e2c541f38eb0ca24dcb
aranguyen pushed a commit to aranguyen/bazel that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
The return value being non-null doesn't assert that we actually parsed the (expected) `.netrc`.

Closes bazelbuild#15902.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 461583660
Change-Id: I0cd9a56c79a2177d89f67e2c541f38eb0ca24dcb
@ShreeM01 ShreeM01 added the team-Remote-Exec Issues and PRs for the Execution (Remote) team label Dec 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
team-Remote-Exec Issues and PRs for the Execution (Remote) team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants