-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 638
fix: don't call Args.add() with an integer #3259
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: don't call Args.add() with an integer #3259
Conversation
The documentation for Bazel's Args states that standard conversion rules are only specified for strings, Files, and Labels. For all other types the conversion to a string is done in an unspecified manner, which is why it should be avoided. Let's stay away from this unspecified behaviour by explicitly converting the precompile optimization level to a string before calling Args.add().
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @EdSchouten, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request improves the robustness and predictability of the build process by ensuring that arguments passed to Bazel's Args.add() method adhere strictly to documented type conversion rules. By explicitly casting an integer value to a string, it eliminates reliance on undefined implicit conversions, thereby preventing potential runtime issues and making the code more resilient to future Bazel updates.
Highlights
- Bazel Args.add() Type Safety: Ensures that the precompile_optimize_level attribute is explicitly converted to a string before being passed to Args.add(), aligning with Bazel's documentation which specifies standard conversion rules only for strings, Files, and Labels, thus preventing reliance on unspecified implicit conversions for integers.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request addresses an issue where the Args.add() method was being called with an integer value, which is not explicitly supported according to Bazel's documentation. The change converts the precompile_optimize_level attribute to a string before passing it to Args.add(). This ensures that the argument is handled in a predictable manner, avoiding unspecified behavior.
The documentation for Bazel's Args states that standard conversion rules are only specified for strings, Files, and Labels. For all other types the conversion to a string is done in an unspecified manner, which is why it should be avoided.
Let's stay away from this unspecified behaviour by explicitly converting the precompile optimization level to a string before calling Args.add().