Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tool runfiles to action #942

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 26, 2022
Merged

Conversation

jheaff1
Copy link
Collaborator

@jheaff1 jheaff1 commented Jul 19, 2022

Previously, tool runfiles were not present at execution time. For example, if the provided tool was a py_binary, the py_binary would fail to run due to the omission of the runfiles.

This relates to bazelbuild/bazel#10110 and #849

This allows the inclusion of FilesToRunProvider instances as well as
File instances. In an upcoming commit, the FilesToRunProviders of tools
will be added to this list, to fix the issue of tool runfiles not
present at execution time.
Previously, tool runfiles were not present at execution time. For
example, if the provided tool was a py_binary, the py_binary would fail
to run due to the omission of the runfiles.

This relates to bazelbuild/bazel#10110
@jheaff1 jheaff1 marked this pull request as ready for review July 19, 2022 17:56
@jheaff1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jheaff1 commented Jul 20, 2022

@jsharpe @UebelAndre Any chance of of a review?

Copy link
Member

@jsharpe jsharpe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for getting round to adding this in. Fixing this has been on my todo list but I've never quite got round to it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants