Skip to content

Conversation

@refcell
Copy link
Contributor

@refcell refcell commented Dec 4, 2025

Description

As far as I could tell, the contracts/ directory is unused and is a legacy item from the test-utils port.

If there's a reason to keep solidity contracts, my suggestion would be to move the contracts into whichever crate would use the compiled artifacts. That way, we keep the top-level repository structure clean. In that case, feel free to close this PR!

@refcell refcell requested a review from danyalprout December 4, 2025 21:13
@refcell refcell self-assigned this Dec 4, 2025
@cb-heimdall
Copy link
Collaborator

cb-heimdall commented Dec 4, 2025

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/1
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
2 if repo is sensitive 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 0
Sum 1

@danyalprout
Copy link
Collaborator

danyalprout commented Dec 4, 2025

I prefer the idea of moving this into one of the crates if needed. Will defer to @haardikk21 as I believe he's midway through refactoring the tests

@refcell
Copy link
Contributor Author

refcell commented Dec 4, 2025

I prefer the idea of moving this into one of the crates if needed. Will defer to @haardikk21 as I believe he's midway through refactoring the tests

Ah got it, didn't realize that was still in progress. If that's the case yes let's move this into whichever crate uses these contracts so it doesn't clutter the top-level repo structure. I can do that in a new PR if @haardikk21 confirms which crate they should be placed in.

@refcell refcell marked this pull request as draft December 5, 2025 01:16
@refcell
Copy link
Contributor Author

refcell commented Dec 5, 2025

I'll move this into an issue so we don't clutter PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants