Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: parameters upgrade #31

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

KonradStaniec
Copy link
Collaborator

  • bumps babylon version to the one with new params

Note: merge only after babylonlabs-io/babylon#45 is merged

Copy link
Member

@Lazar955 Lazar955 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

staker/types.go Outdated
@@ -464,6 +462,19 @@ func parseWatchStakingRequest(
currentParams *cl.StakingParams,
network *chaincfg.Params,
) (*stakingRequestedEvent, error) {
// TODO: This check re-implements whole babylon validation logic. We should
Copy link
Member

@Lazar955 Lazar955 Sep 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add "Todo(konrad)", I feel like only putting "todo" gets lost quickly and setting your name/username next to it adds move ownership that this will eventually get done

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good point!

Actually I would go a step forward and say that every todo should have format //TODO(link_to_issue) .

Created #32 and will link it there.

Copy link
Member

@gitferry gitferry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work!

@KonradStaniec KonradStaniec merged commit dac0bb6 into main Sep 4, 2024
8 checks passed
@KonradStaniec KonradStaniec deleted the konradstaniec/parameters-upgrade branch September 4, 2024 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants