Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

204 cross improvements #205

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 30, 2021
Merged

204 cross improvements #205

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 30, 2021

Conversation

mtabacman
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@mtabacman mtabacman requested a review from gcotelli June 30, 2021 18:56
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 30, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #205 (b1e914f) into release-candidate (ce05e1b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           release-candidate     #205   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage              99.96%   99.96%           
==================================================
  Files                    229      229           
  Lines                  22078    22078           
==================================================
  Hits                   22070    22070           
  Misses                     8        8           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
source/Willow-Core/TimeFieldWebView.class.st 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...-Core-Tests/WillowJavascriptNamespaceTest.class.st 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ce05e1b...b1e914f. Read the comment docs.

@gcotelli gcotelli merged commit 1e4a152 into release-candidate Jun 30, 2021
@gcotelli gcotelli deleted the 204-cross-improvements branch June 30, 2021 21:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants