-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for DNX/.NET Core #59
Comments
you're invited to contribute. btw, a one-liner, even it's a good idea, is kind of unpleasant. we're providing this great piece of software for free; treat it with love. |
I apologize, I didn't think that a description was necessary. I will check what needs to be done in order to support DNX and .NET core. |
That would be great, thank you!
|
I really don't know how to retrofit this and maintain the existing project and solution files. The best I could do is to implement this on another branch, without all the old project/solution files, etc. |
I don't know what's the benefit of supporting DNX and what do you mean with .NET Core. |
https://github.com/glen-84/SmartFormat.NET/tree/DNX It's building for dnx451 (regular framework under DNX), but there are 13 errors for DNX Core (~7 unique). You'll need to go through the list and find out if there are plans to add support for certain types/methods in .NET Core, and if not, find alternatives (assuming that you do want to support .NET Core). Removed:
Notes:
|
@glen-84, when do you expect that this is supported by SmartFormat.NET? Is it something you really wait for it or do you just want to support the project?
I guess we will wait :) |
I was writing an implementation of an i.e. It's not super-high priority. |
Any updates on this? Microsoft just released the next version of Visual Studio with .NET CORE and we would like to migrate our software to the new .NET version. |
Created a Pull Request for supporting .NET Core (Standard 1.6). Finally supporting Async in both: .Net Framwork 2-4, but also .NET Core. |
@scottrippey, @SeriousM: Priorities and interest in projects change, that's absolutely fine for me. Since MailMergeLib relies on SmartFormat.Net I would just like to know, whether there will be further development of this GitHub repository, or whether I'm on my own. |
@axunonb Norbert, sorry for the delayed responses. As you've correctly guessed, I'm unable to continue development of this repo, as I've been out of .NET development for many years. |
@scottrippey Scott, I'm sorry to hear that, and I also think it would be a pity to stop working on SmartFormat.Net. So yes, you may add me as a collaborator and I'll try my best. With NuGet publishing I'll have to find out what to do. I'll let you know. For now thanks again for the good work with this repo. |
@scottrippey Scott, I had just been checking various options on how to go on with SmartFormat.Net. So:
|
Adding you as a collaborator is the most simple thing because the URL stays |
@axunonb I've added you as both a GitHub contributor and a Nuget Owner! With great power comes great responsibility! :) |
Okay I confirmed both, thanks. @SeriousM are you still actively contributing? I'd be interested in your opinion about this Pull Request. |
Pull request merged. |
Hi Norbert, I'm not an active contributor anymore. Am 01.11.2016 10:17 schrieb "Norbert Bietsch" [email protected]:
|
remove some redundant methods
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: