-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 722
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Adds cleanup_final #4853
feat: Adds cleanup_final #4853
Conversation
api/s2n.h
Outdated
* The difference between this API and s2n_cleanup is that s2n_cleanup may not fully clean up | ||
* the library if it is called on a thread that did not initialize s2n-tls. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure it's clear when this API should be used vs s2n_cleanup. It sounds like this API should maybe always be used instead of s2n_cleanup? If so, should we say something in s2n_cleanup to use this instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Basically, s2n_cleanup_final doesn't really have a usecase unless you disable the atexit handler. If the atexit handler is on, you don't need cleanup_final. And we are planning on turning off the atexit handler soon, just not in this specific PR. I just don't want to write docs that I'm going to have to rewrite in this PR #4846.
Resolved issues:
N/A
Description of changes:
Adds the s2n_cleanup_final() function to our API list. This is the counterpart to s2n_cleanup_thread. You can see that if I cherry-pick this API in this PR it passes our CI (except for our flaky tests and current known CI failures): #4846. The only test it does not pass is build_aws_crt_cpp.sh. This is the CRT's test suite and they need to use s2n_cleanup_final API in those tests first.
Call-outs:
I don't see any reason why we would make this API unstable. There is no reason why we would delete it once we have it. 😢
Testing:
Includes unit test.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.