-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
feat(ec2): throw ValidationErrors instead of untyped Errors #34127
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Exemption Request: This PR did only refactoring. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(This review is outdated)
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #34127 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 83.98% 83.99%
=======================================
Files 120 120
Lines 6976 6977 +1
Branches 1178 1178
=======================================
+ Hits 5859 5860 +1
Misses 1005 1005
Partials 112 112
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
||
if (props.snapshotId && !Token.isUnresolved(props.snapshotId) && !/^snap-[0-9a-fA-F]+$/.test(props.snapshotId)) { | ||
throw new Error('`snapshotId` does match expected pattern. Expected `snap-<hexadecmial value>` (ex: `snap-05abe246af`) or Token'); | ||
throw new ValidationError('`snapshotId` does not match expected pattern. Expected `snap-<hexadecmial value>` (ex: `snap-05abe246af`) or Token', this); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fix message
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for making these changes!
@Mergifyio update |
☑️ Nothing to do
|
@Mergifyio update |
❌ Mergify doesn't have permission to updateFor security reasons, Mergify can't update this pull request. Try updating locally. |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
This pull request has been removed from the queue for the following reason: The pull request can't be updated. You should update or rebase your pull request manually. If you do, this pull request will automatically be requeued once the queue conditions match again. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, mergify is not playing nice. hopefully this time it will work.
@Mergifyio update |
☑️ Nothing to do
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
This pull request has been removed from the queue for the following reason: The pull request can't be updated. You should update or rebase your pull request manually. If you do, this pull request will automatically be requeued once the queue conditions match again. |
@paulhcsun |
@Mergifyio update |
❌ Mergify doesn't have permission to updateFor security reasons, Mergify can't update this pull request. Try updating locally. |
@Mergifyio requeue |
✅ The queue state of this pull request has been cleaned. It can be re-embarked automatically |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see. |
Issue # (if applicable)
Relates to #32569
Reason for this change
Untyped Errors are not recommended.
Description of changes
Change Error to ValidationError / UnscopedValidationError
Describe any new or updated permissions being added
None
Description of how you validated changes
Existing tests. Exemptions granted as this is a refactor of existing code.
Checklist
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license