feat(ec2): connectable ec2.Prefixlist

[watany-dev]

Issue # (if applicable)

There was no special reason for this PR, it simply stopped.

#32084

Reason for this change

Prefix lists are often used in EC2 ingress and egress configurations, but the current interface is unnecessarily complex.

const sg = new SecurityGroup(stack, 'SecurityGroup', { vpc });
sg.connections.allowFrom(Peer.prefixlist(prefixList.prefixlListId), Port.tcp(443));

const sg = new SecurityGroup(stack, 'SecurityGroup', { vpc });
sg.connections.allowFrom(prefixList, Port.tcp(443));

Describe any new or updated permissions being added

None

Description of how you validated changes

integ fixed.

Checklist

• My code adheres to the CONTRIBUTING GUIDE and DESIGN GUIDELINES

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

[aws-cdk-automation]

(This review is outdated)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.38%. Comparing base (e6f5bc8) to head (76418b8).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #33813   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.38%   82.38%           
=======================================
  Files         120      120           
  Lines        6937     6937           
  Branches     1170     1170           
=======================================
  Hits         5715     5715           
  Misses       1119     1119           
  Partials      103      103           

Flag	Coverage Δ
suite.unit	82.38% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
packages/aws-cdk	∅ <ø> (∅)
packages/aws-cdk-lib/core	82.38% <ø> (ø)

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

[aws-cdk-automation]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
• Commit ID: 76418b8
• Result: FAILED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[Tietew]

Hi @watany-dev
Good work but this PR seems to be a duplicate of my #33617
Cloud you take a look at my PR please?
Thank you.

[watany-dev]

Understood. I'll move on to your review there.

[aws-cdk-automation]

This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state.

[aws-cdk-automation]

This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state.

[aws-cdk-automation]

This PR cannot be merged because it has conflicts. Please resolve them. The PR will be considered stale and closed if it remains in an unmergeable state.

[aws-cdk-automation]

This PR has been in the BUILD FAILING state for 3 weeks, and looks abandoned. Note that PRs with failing linting check or builds are not reviewed, please ensure your build is passing

To prevent automatic closure:

• Resume work on the PR
• OR request an exemption by adding a comment containing 'Exemption Request' with justification e.x "Exemption Request: "
• OR request clarification by adding a comment containing 'Clarification Request' with a question e.x "Clarification Request: "

This PR will automatically close in 14 days if no action is taken.

[aws-cdk-automation]

This PR has been deemed to be abandoned, and will be automatically closed. Please create a new PR for these changes if you think this decision has been made in error.

[github-actions]

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.