-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(core): wrong priority for tag aspects #33460
Merged
mergify
merged 11 commits into
aws:main
from
hwwi:hwwi/aspects/fix-missing-default-priority
Feb 25, 2025
+40
−6
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
13cad94
chore(aspects): fix missing default priorities
hwwi edc102f
linter
kaizencc d11bd68
Merge branch 'main' into hwwi/aspects/fix-missing-default-priority
kaizencc 007b6cd
add unit test
hwwi d63af2b
fix exists unit test related 'Tags.of'
hwwi 942ef26
revert package.json
hwwi 0354609
Merge branch 'main' into hwwi/aspects/fix-missing-default-priority
kaizencc e784819
Update packages/aws-cdk-lib/core/test/tag-aspect.test.ts
kaizencc 8cd482f
apply suggestions
hwwi 7653d6f
Merge branch 'main' into hwwi/aspects/fix-missing-default-priority
hwwi 67bbbbc
Merge branch 'main' into hwwi/aspects/fix-missing-default-priority
mergify[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting. It looks like the test was written to the code instead of the code to the test. Otherwise the test would have called out the priority as mutating, and the code with the typeo would have failed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I get the general your suggestion, but I’d like to understand it more clearly. Could you share a code snippet to illustrate your point?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think in this case it was an error on the original authors part to simply get the tests to pass, and so its ok to change it here.
@dsilbergleithcu-godaddy do you have any suggestions for how to make sure this kind of human error doesn't happen in the future? otherwise i'm just kind of chalking it up to an oversight.