chore(dynamodb): explicitly render false pointInTimeRecovery
#19757
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Today, if the property `pointInTimeRecoveryEnabled` is either `undefined`, or `false`, we don't render the `pointInTimeRecoverySpecification` property in the Table L1. A customer wants to write an Aspect that checks whether this property has been set, and they cannot differentiate between the "not provided" and "set to `false`" cases. Change the logic to render `pointInTimeRecoverySpecification` even for `false` pointInTimeRecoveryEnabled values. Fixes aws#19748
|
|
2 tasks
github-actions
bot
added
feature-request
rix0rrr
approved these changes
Apr 5, 2022
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
StevePotter
pushed a commit
to StevePotter/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2022
…9757) Today, if the property `pointInTimeRecoveryEnabled` is either `undefined`, or `false`, we don't render the `pointInTimeRecoverySpecification` property in the Table L1. A customer wants to write an Aspect that checks whether this property has been set, and they cannot differentiate between the "not provided" and "set to `false`" cases. Change the logic to render `pointInTimeRecoverySpecification` even for `false` pointInTimeRecoveryEnabled values. Fixes aws#19748 ---- ### All Submissions: * [ ] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features * [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [ ] Did you use `cdk-integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `cdk-integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Today, if the property
pointInTimeRecoveryEnabledis eitherundefined, orfalse,we don't render the
pointInTimeRecoverySpecificationproperty in the Table L1.A customer wants to write an Aspect that checks whether this property has been set,
and they cannot differentiate between the "not provided" and "set to
false" cases.Change the logic to render
pointInTimeRecoverySpecificationeven forfalsepointInTimeRecoveryEnabled values.
Fixes #19748
All Submissions:
Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:
New Features
cdk-integto deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e.cdk-integwithout--dry-run)?By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license