-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
fix(core): toJsonString() cannot handle list intrinsics
#13544
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8b1e6d3
fix(core): `toJsonString()` cannot handle lists
rix0rrr 0bd7841
Merge branch 'master' into huijbers/json-real-list
mergify[bot] 403513c
Merge branch 'master' into huijbers/json-real-list
mergify[bot] 79711fe
Merge branch 'master' into huijbers/json-real-list
mergify[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rix0rrr I think I found a way with a
Fn::Joinon aFn::Splitacting like a replace:For #13465 and the issue with the array of ENIs, it looks like that
Gives the following CF
{ "Fn::Join": [ "", [ "{\"action\":\"describeNetworkInterfaces\",\"service\":\"EC2\",\"parameters\":{\"NetworkInterfaceIds\":[", { "Fn::Join": [ "", { "Fn::Split": [ "\"\"", { "Fn::Join": [ "", [ "\"", { "Fn::Join": [ "\\\",\\\"", { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "OtherEndpoint88C37F72", "NetworkInterfaceIds" ] } ] }, "\"" ] ] } ] } ] }, "]},\"physicalResourceId\":{\"id\":\"physical-id\"},\"outputPath\":\"NetworkInterfaces.0.PrivateIpAddress\"}" ] ] }Successfully tested this with a
GatewayVpcEndpointwhich has no ENIs and hence returns an empty list for thevpcEndpointNetworkInterfaceIdsattribute.Even if it's really really ugly, it's better than a custom resource, right? WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
EHRMAGERD
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are like a wizard.
A dirty wizard...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like it though.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wait no. This solution will break when presented with
[""].That value would successfully make it through the transformation initially and then be substituted away to
[].There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bu then maybe the CR is the right solution
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm also thinking about it... afraid nothing's to be done, as:
Once we've JOINed, we've lost the ability to make the distinction between
[]and[""]... right?(I'm starting to doubt myself now)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think there's a way to do it. You loose information after the first join:
and the only "first operation" you can do on the array with CF is a
Fn::Join.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK our comments crossed each other... I don't think it's possible in pure CF. This is sad 😢 .
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IF ONLY we had a functional
{ Fn::If }...