Enhance EKS AccessEntries
policy attachements and delta logic
#102
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prior to this patch, we observed some issues with the controller
behaviour regarding access policy association and delta computations,
specifically:
controller restart)
policies, and patch the desired ones. (Even when it's unnecessary).
The root cause was identifier as the usage of
reflect.DeepEqual
forslices. According to the
reflect
library documentationDeepEqual
returns false if the comapred elements are a nil slice anda "non-nil empty slice" (e.g
nil
and[]string{}
).This combined with the possibility of a user providing a nil
namespaces
slice, while the controller sets an empty one (based on theAPI response), cause behaviour inconsistencies.
Users shouldn't care/worry about the "nil-ity" of their arrays/slices;
it is up to the controller to accurately compute the deltas.
This patch replaces the usage of
reflect.DeepEqual
with a meticulouscustom delta function.
Signed-off-by: Amine Hilaly [email protected]
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.