-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(DataStore): dataStore cannot connect to model's sync subscriptions (AWS_LAMBDA auth type) #3550
Open
MuniekMg
wants to merge
3
commits into
aws-amplify:main
Choose a base branch
from
MuniekMg:fix/datastore_subscriptions_with_sync_expressions
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b96fbda
fix(DataStore): dataStore cannot connect to model's sync subscription…
MuniekMg e70a3f5
fix(DataStore): dataStore cannot connect to model's sync subscription…
MuniekMg e0398e4
fix(DataStore): dataStore cannot connect to model's sync subscription…
MuniekMg File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
45 changes: 45 additions & 0 deletions
45
Amplify/Categories/DataStore/Subscribe/DataStoreSubscriptionRTFError.swift
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ | ||
// | ||
// Copyright Amazon.com Inc. or its affiliates. | ||
// All Rights Reserved. | ||
// | ||
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 | ||
// | ||
|
||
import Foundation | ||
|
||
public enum RTFError: CaseIterable { | ||
case unknownField | ||
case maxAttributes | ||
case maxCombinations | ||
case repeatedFieldname | ||
case notGroup | ||
case fieldNotInType | ||
|
||
private var uniqueMessagePart: String { | ||
switch self { | ||
case .unknownField: | ||
return "UnknownArgument: Unknown field argument filter" | ||
case .maxAttributes: | ||
return "Filters exceed maximum attributes limit" | ||
case .maxCombinations: | ||
return "Filters combination exceed maximum limit" | ||
case .repeatedFieldname: | ||
return "filter uses same fieldName multiple time" | ||
case .notGroup: | ||
return "The variables input contains a field name 'not'" | ||
case .fieldNotInType: | ||
return "The variables input contains a field that is not defined for input object type" | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Init RTF error based on error's debugDescription value | ||
public init?(description: String) { | ||
guard | ||
let rtfError = RTFError.allCases.first(where: { description.contains($0.uniqueMessagePart) }) | ||
else { | ||
return nil | ||
} | ||
|
||
self = rtfError | ||
} | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is
maxRetries
updated here to account for theattempt
being incremented for the RTF retry case? So the overallattempt
tomaxRetries
counts will continue to represent the number of auth types to attempt? (maxRetries is set to the number of auth types to attempt in multi-auth rules scenarios).