Skip to content

Conversation

@JonathanOppenheimer
Copy link
Member

@JonathanOppenheimer JonathanOppenheimer commented Oct 8, 2025

Why this should be merged

I was looking to sync a coreth PR, and made minor changes here to bring the CI in closer alignment with each other. This is a pretty nit picky PR. The PR I partially synced here is ava-labs/coreth#1252

@JonathanOppenheimer JonathanOppenheimer changed the title sync: align ci files format. PARTIAL sync: coreth PR #1252: align ci files format Oct 8, 2025
@JonathanOppenheimer
Copy link
Member Author

@maru-ava, I want to confirm the other changes in your original coreth PR do not apply here, correct?

@maru-ava
Copy link
Contributor

maru-ava commented Oct 9, 2025

@maru-ava, I want to confirm the other changes in your original coreth PR do not apply here, correct?

I suggest removing setup-go from the jobs that use run-monitored-tmpnet-cmd since it provides the correct golang version via the avalanchego nix shell.

@JonathanOppenheimer
Copy link
Member Author

@maru-ava, I want to confirm the other changes in your original coreth PR do not apply here, correct?

I suggest removing setup-go from the jobs that use run-monitored-tmpnet-cmd since it provides the correct golang version via the avalanchego nix shell.

Gotcha!

@ceyonur ceyonur added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch Oct 10, 2025
@ceyonur ceyonur added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 10, 2025
@ceyonur ceyonur added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit c192255 Oct 10, 2025
13 checks passed
@ceyonur ceyonur deleted the align-ci branch October 10, 2025 17:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants