Skip to content

Conversation

@eddiebergman
Copy link
Contributor

Updates the link for get_smac_object_callback so our docs build again. Technically this is not correct because we are using an older version of SMAC right now and there's no docs to link to for that. However it shouldn't be too different and we estimate this is unlikely to be an issue until we do update SMAC.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1610 (98d4aac) into development (6a97f72) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           development    #1610      +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage        83.32%   83.35%   +0.03%     
===============================================
  Files              156      156              
  Lines            11927    11927              
  Branches          1896     1896              
===============================================
+ Hits              9938     9942       +4     
+ Misses            1422     1418       -4     
  Partials           567      567              

Impacted file tree graph

@eddiebergman eddiebergman merged commit 1abd1f9 into development Nov 15, 2022
@eddiebergman eddiebergman deleted the fix-smac-doc-nolink branch November 15, 2022 16:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants