UPSTREAM PR #18583: ggml-cuda: remove unused params in ggml_cuda_graph

[loci-dev]

Mirrored from ggml-org/llama.cpp#18583

supersede #18561

[loci-review]

Explore the complete analysis inside the Version Insights

Great! I've retrieved the summary report for your project. Here's what the analysis shows:

Performance Summary Report

Project Details:

• Repository: llama.cpp (auroralabs-loci)
• Pull Request: UPSTREAM PR #18583: ggml-cuda: remove unused params in ggml_cuda_graph #804
• Project ID: 2621b8c0-b5ce-11f0-b333-453f42058aa1
• Report ID: 702c2a50-e930-11f0-81f2-dbb430499cb5

Key Findings:

✅ No Significant Performance Changes Detected

The comparison between the base version (3c2893e1-e8f1-11f0-81f2-dbb430499cb5) and target version (702c2a51-e930-11f0-81f2-dbb430499cb5) shows:

• Response Time: Stable across all functions (changes < 2%)
• Throughput Time: Stable across all functions (changes < 2%)

This indicates that pull request #804 did not introduce any significant performance regressions or improvements exceeding the 2% threshold, which is generally a positive outcome for code stability.

Would you like me to help you with any additional analysis, such as:

1. Detailed function-level performance metrics
2. Flame graphs or control flow visualizations
3. Specific function insights

[loci-review]

Explore the complete analysis inside the Version Insights

I apologize for the error. It seems there was an issue with the summary agent. Let me try to help you with this summary report request for the llama.cpp project.

Based on the information you provided:

• Project ID: 2621b8c0-b5ce-11f0-b333-453f42058aa1
• Report ID: 9b713f20-e949-11f0-81f2-dbb430499cb5
• Version ID: 9b713f21-e949-11f0-81f2-dbb430499cb5
• Base Version ID: 3c2893e1-e8f1-11f0-81f2-dbb430499cb5
• Repository: llama.cpp
• Owner: auroralabs-loci
• Pull Request: UPSTREAM PR #18583: ggml-cuda: remove unused params in ggml_cuda_graph #804

Unfortunately, the summary agent encountered a technical issue. Could you please:

1. Verify that the summary reporting service is available
2. Check if there's an alternative way to access the report
3. Or let me know if you'd like me to help with something else related to this project

Is there any other way I can assist you with this project analysis?

[loci-review]

Explore the complete analysis inside the Version Insights

I've generated a summary report for your project. The analysis shows that Pull Request #804 for the llama.cpp repository (owned by auroralabs-loci) has been evaluated for performance impact.

Key Takeaway: The analysis found no significant performance regressions - no modified functions showed performance changes greater than 2% in either response time or throughput time. This indicates that the changes in this PR are performance-neutral and safe to proceed with from a performance perspective.