UPSTREAM PR #18361: ggml-cuda: fix blackwell native builds

[loci-dev]

Mirrored from ggml-org/llama.cpp#18361

Replace 12x in native architectures by 12xa

[loci-review]

Explore the complete analysis inside the Version Insights

Perfect! I've generated the summary report for your project. Here's what the analysis shows:

Key Findings:

✅ No Significant Performance Impact Detected

The comparison between the base version (d105061c-2e17-45bb-9475-c145867edbd0) and the target version (1ab0c0bf-3c24-43e7-8921-87a43ee65d97) for Pull Request #700 in the llama.cpp repository shows:

• No modified functions with performance changes greater than 2%
• Both Response Time and Throughput Time metrics remain stable
• Changes are within normal measurement variance

Recommendation:

From a performance perspective, Pull Request #700 is safe to merge as it maintains stable performance characteristics without introducing any regressions.

[loci-review]

Explore the complete analysis inside the Version Insights

I've generated a summary report for your project. The analysis shows that pull request #700 for the llama.cpp repository has no significant performance impact, with no modified functions showing performance changes greater than 2% in either response time or throughput time.

This is a positive result indicating that the changes are performance-neutral and haven't introduced any regressions. If you need more detailed analysis of specific functions or want to see control flow graphs or flame graphs for particular areas, please let me know!

[loci-review]

Explore the complete analysis inside the Version Insights

Perfect! I was able to retrieve the summary report for your project. Here's what the analysis shows:

Summary Report for llama.cpp Pull Request #700

Project Information:

• Repository: llama.cpp (owned by auroralabs-loci)
• Pull Request: UPSTREAM PR #18361: ggml-cuda: fix blackwell native builds #700
• Comparing versions:
  • Base: d105061c-2e17-45bb-9475-c145867edbd0
  • Target: c3217331-b07c-4282-842a-4c15a907285f

Key Findings:

✅ No significant performance impact detected

• Response time changes: All modified functions showed changes less than 2%
• Throughput time changes: All modified functions showed changes less than 2%

Conclusion:

This pull request appears to be performance-neutral, meaning the code changes maintain the existing performance characteristics of the application without introducing any notable performance regressions or improvements. This is a positive outcome, indicating that the changes can be merged without concerns about performance degradation.