Extremely slow since 1.2.0 (Atom.) #153
Comments
|
I've discovered it's because we had a link to a large folder with about a thousand files but I didn't notice that problem prior to 1.2.0 so I don't know if there is a perf problem somewhere. |
|
@jeancroy yeah 1.1 was blazing fast, even with those links it was blazing fast, I didn't notice we were using those links until 1.2.0. Alternate scoring is enabled because I default CTRL+O to fuzzy finder because it's much faster and it made things even easier to open. |
|
Ok because I had one user report that the alternate scoring was slow on his system. Can you try disabling it just to see if speed is faster ? It would surprise me because it hasn't really changed since the one package with 1.1. And your system clearly have spec to run it. |
|
I'm experiencing the same problem, when I turn off alternative scrolling, it gets a little faster, but still slower. update:checking |
|
If someone can reproduce the "slower on v1.2.0" or "slower with alternative scoring" ... can you do a CPU profile per the instructions in the Atom Flight Manual? Having specific information could be quite useful. |
|
I do Ruby, C and Python because I do systems, JavaScript isn't on my list of goto tools unless I'm in the front, .bundle is always in the list of files to ignore by default in all projects and we tell Atom to ignore those files too, we don't get any folders or files from |
|
Sorry for commenting on old issue, but I see it's still opened and it matches my experience. It is slow in 1.13, and it was faster before, 1.12 iirc. Checking exclude VCS ignored paths option helps, but that's not a fix, I need to fuzzy find vendor classes because I often read/extend vendors code. |
|
@lee-dohm I can try, can you double check the link in the comment, it leads to home page now? |
|
@umpirsky I updated the link above and you can find it here: http://flight-manual.atom.io/hacking-atom/sections/debugging/#diagnose-runtime-performance |
|
@lee-dohm I saved, but saved file is empty for some reason, here is the screenshot:
|
|
If you can try again it would be helpful. The benefit of having the CPU
profile is being able to drill down and see the numbers for ourselves and
investigate where the bottlenecks are.
…On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Saša Stamenković ***@***.***> wrote:
@lee-dohm <https://github.com/lee-dohm> I saved, but saved file is empty
for some reason, here is the screenshot:
[image: screenshot from 2017-02-07 18-38-14]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/208957/22703483/9cafbc4e-ed64-11e6-9290-bf6f98c99fe5.png>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#153 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA_XKapgqgw8-n8AYJ8-YwYIe7e5O-0Bks5raKwqgaJpZM4Gh0Lm>
.
|
|
@lee-dohm I tried a number of times, always empty files saved. Is there some preparation I should do in order to be able to save them? |
|
You're right, I'm getting the same problem (and the same SecurityError).
I'm following up with the dev team.
…On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Saša Stamenković ***@***.***> wrote:
@lee-dohm <https://github.com/lee-dohm> I tried a number of times, always
empty files saved. Is there some preparation I should do in order to be
able to save them?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#153 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA_XKQ8RlpWp23U9QnYXosPDfI2itmkVks5raLYkgaJpZM4Gh0Lm>
.
|
|
@lee-dohm OK, feel free to ping me for CPU profile once you figure it out, I'd be glad to provide one. |
|
Will do @umpirsky ... we're tracking this in atom/atom#13767 if you would like to subscribe as well. |
|
It got much faster after disabling |
With the release of Atom 1.2.0 fuzzy-finder is now extremely slow. Where before it would instantly display results and react much faster to my typing, now it delays so much that I'm done typing before it even finds the first result and I feel like I could slam my head on the table 3 or 4 times before it even discovers the result.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: