-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
Add --find-links support for uv pip list
#16103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
92d45bd
Add initial work
terror e7484fe
Remove result from test signature
terror f4a4400
Update snapshot
terror a4b8d5e
Tweak ordering
terror 26befb9
Sort flat index entries
terror 22a559c
Keep existing message / semantics
terror 7ba1843
Combine flat indexes into `IndexUrls`
terror 1bbffb1
Split up functions
terror 4da8895
Move the candidate filtering closure into a dedicated helper
terror 00c13b8
Drop exclude newer from snapshot tests
terror d2e7717
Merge candidates from all flat indexes
charliermarsh 0c7e74c
Honor no-index for simple registry lookups
charliermarsh b142414
Combine candidates from legacy find-links
charliermarsh 9b796f6
Disable explicit flat indexes with no-index
charliermarsh 9f36d2b
Limit find-links metadata to latest queries
charliermarsh 9989be8
Simplify find-links metadata handling
charliermarsh 3d0365f
Separate find-links metadata fetching
charliermarsh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was there a reason why we did not want to include
flat_indexeshere?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not aware of any
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately I really can't remember. I'm sure there's a reason for it. Probably because historically we didn't query flat indexes in the registry client? Something like that?