Skip to content

Use pyo3 binding for uv_build#11972

Closed
j178 wants to merge 10 commits intoastral-sh:konsti/standalone-build-backend-packagefrom
j178:pyo3-uv-build
Closed

Use pyo3 binding for uv_build#11972
j178 wants to merge 10 commits intoastral-sh:konsti/standalone-build-backend-packagefrom
j178:pyo3-uv-build

Conversation

@j178
Copy link
Contributor

@j178 j178 commented Mar 5, 2025

Summary

This is an experiment with the pyo3 binding for the uv_build backend introduced in #11446, as recommended by @T-256 in this comment: #11446 (comment)

@j178 j178 force-pushed the pyo3-uv-build branch 2 times, most recently from dc18125 to a28cb5e Compare March 5, 2025 07:25
@zanieb zanieb requested a review from konstin March 5, 2025 16:38
@konstin
Copy link
Member

konstin commented Mar 6, 2025

How do a binary with a CLI and a library with pyo3 bindings compare in terms of platform compatibility and binary site? Especially platform compatibility and how easy it is to build for all sorts of configurations is a main driver for the uv_build design.

@zanieb zanieb force-pushed the konsti/standalone-build-backend-package branch from d2c1c22 to 5ea23ce Compare March 6, 2025 19:11
@zanieb zanieb deleted the branch astral-sh:konsti/standalone-build-backend-package March 6, 2025 19:27
@zanieb zanieb closed this Mar 6, 2025
@konstin
Copy link
Member

konstin commented Mar 7, 2025

Did github just autoclose this PR instead of updating the base branch to main?

@zanieb
Copy link
Member

zanieb commented Mar 7, 2025

Oh weird, I did not close this — sorry about that. It must have closed when I rebased and merged?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants