Allow suppressing RUF102

[amyreese]

Check to see if any of the valid codes are RUF102 and suppress itself.

Fixes #23191

[astral-sh-bot]

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

[ntBre]

Thanks, this makes sense to me and seems similar to what we do for RUF100. Should we add a test or two?

[amyreese]

The main concern for me is that without #23237 then any # noqa: RUF102 will permanently also raise a RUF100 diagnostic, forcing users to do # noqa: RUF100, RUF102.

[ntBre]

Okay, I think I'm understanding better. It makes sense to me to make RUF100 and RUF102 know about each other, much like the changes for RUF100 itself in #1305, which I think are essentially how we avoid this for RUF100 now. Can we just do this for RUF100 and RUF102? Why do the other RUF10 rules need to be marked as used too?

I think some tests would help me in any case. I'm having trouble keeping all the conditions straight with the context spread out as it is.