Skip to content

Stabilize UP042#22924

Merged
ntBre merged 1 commit intobrent/0.15.0from
brent/up042
Jan 29, 2026
Merged

Stabilize UP042#22924
ntBre merged 1 commit intobrent/0.15.0from
brent/up042

Conversation

@ntBre
Copy link
Contributor

@ntBre ntBre commented Jan 28, 2026

Closes #22816. As I note on the issue, I was previously hesitant to stabilize
this rule because of its long ## Fix safety docs and the TODO comment in the
source code. However, the behavior change in the docs is simply handled by
making the fix unsafe, and resolving the TODO shouldn't require a breaking
change. It will only allow the fix to be offered in more cases.

The docs and tests looked good.

Closes #22816. As I note on the issue, I was previously hesitant to stabilize
this rule because of its long `## Fix safety` docs and the TODO comment in the
source code. However, the behavior change in the docs is simply handled by
making the fix unsafe, and resolving the TODO shouldn't require a breaking
change. It will only allow the fix to be offered in more cases.

The docs and tests looked good.
@ntBre ntBre added this to the v0.15 milestone Jan 28, 2026
@ntBre ntBre added the rule Implementing or modifying a lint rule label Jan 28, 2026
@ntBre ntBre requested review from amyreese and dylwil3 January 28, 2026 18:30
@ntBre ntBre linked an issue Jan 28, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@astral-sh-bot
Copy link

astral-sh-bot bot commented Jan 28, 2026

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

@ntBre ntBre merged commit 89add59 into brent/0.15.0 Jan 29, 2026
42 checks passed
@ntBre ntBre deleted the brent/up042 branch January 29, 2026 13:42
@ntBre ntBre mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2026
3 tasks
ntBre added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2026
Closes #22816. As I note on the issue, I was previously hesitant to
stabilize
this rule because of its long `## Fix safety` docs and the TODO comment
in the
source code. However, the behavior change in the docs is simply handled
by
making the fix unsafe, and resolving the TODO shouldn't require a
breaking
change. It will only allow the fix to be offered in more cases.

The docs and tests looked good.
ntBre added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2026
Closes #22816. As I note on the issue, I was previously hesitant to
stabilize
this rule because of its long `## Fix safety` docs and the TODO comment
in the
source code. However, the behavior change in the docs is simply handled
by
making the fix unsafe, and resolving the TODO shouldn't require a
breaking
change. It will only allow the fix to be offered in more cases.

The docs and tests looked good.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rule Implementing or modifying a lint rule

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consider UP042 for stabilization

3 participants