-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
Add a SourceFile to OldDiagnostic
#18356
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
274282b
Rename `ruff_linter::Diagnostic` to `OldDiagnostic`
ntBre 24e6bab
fix docs
ntBre af12913
Add a `SourceFile` to `OldDiagnostic`
ntBre 712f57f
move source_file to LogicalLinesContext
ntBre 7355a4d
Add DiagnosticsCollector and use internally in Checker
ntBre 5f08793
construct the SourceFile eagerly
ntBre 9214a3c
use DiagnosticCollector instead of SourceFile in most cases
ntBre 0c19b40
Merge branch 'main' into brent/diagnostic-source-file
ntBre b90527b
collector -> diagnostics
ntBre 068c6de
make retain and swap_remove take &mut self
ntBre ef7fa4f
make with_diagnostics take &mut self
ntBre 347fe60
replace diagnostics helpers with as_mut_vec and iter
ntBre 8d16bb6
DiagnosticsCollector -> LintContext
ntBre 48d3476
diagnostics -> context, or lint_context when context was taken
ntBre 4a35895
skip locator.line_index() check
ntBre File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit. Maybe rename to diagnostics. It's the more important part of the name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah okay, that makes sense. I replaced all of them!
Do you think
diagnostics.report_diagnosticis too repetitive? Anddiagnostics.into_diagnostics, though that one is much less common.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not ideal for sure :) I also thought about
LintContextThat would allow us to put more stuff on it that's needed by all lint rules and isn't directly tied toChecker.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like that. I can do one more rename to
LintContextand update the variable names tocontext.