[pyupgrade] Add fix safety section to docs (UP008, UP022)

[Kalmaegi]

Summary

add fix safety section to replace_stdout_stderr and super_call_with_parameters, for #15584
I checked the behavior and found that these two files could only potentially delete the appended comments, so I submitted them as a PR.

[ntBre]

Thanks! I think these are the only reasons these are unsafe, and I tested them in the playground to show that they both definitely delete comments.

[github-actions]

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

ℹ️ ecosystem check detected linter changes. (+8 -6 violations, +0 -0 fixes in 3 projects; 52 projects unchanged)

apache/airflow (+4 -4 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --no-fix --output-format concise --preview --select ALL

- providers/cncf/kubernetes/src/airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/executors/kubernetes_executor_utils.py:141:17: PERF403 Use `dict.update` instead of a for-loop
+ providers/cncf/kubernetes/src/airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/executors/kubernetes_executor_utils.py:141:17: PERF403 Use a dictionary comprehension instead of a for-loop
- providers/exasol/src/airflow/providers/exasol/hooks/exasol.py:70:17: PERF403 Use `dict.update` instead of a for-loop
+ providers/exasol/src/airflow/providers/exasol/hooks/exasol.py:70:17: PERF403 Use a dictionary comprehension instead of a for-loop
- providers/mysql/src/airflow/providers/mysql/hooks/mysql.py:191:17: PERF403 Use `dict.update` instead of a for-loop
+ providers/mysql/src/airflow/providers/mysql/hooks/mysql.py:191:17: PERF403 Use a dictionary comprehension instead of a for-loop
- providers/postgres/src/airflow/providers/postgres/hooks/postgres.py:171:17: PERF403 Use `dict.update` instead of a for-loop
+ providers/postgres/src/airflow/providers/postgres/hooks/postgres.py:171:17: PERF403 Use a dictionary comprehension instead of a for-loop

apache/superset (+2 -2 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --no-fix --output-format concise --preview --select ALL

- superset/migrations/versions/2021-04-12_12-38_fc3a3a8ff221_migrate_filter_sets_to_new_format.py:122:21: PERF403 Use `dict.update` instead of a for-loop
+ superset/migrations/versions/2021-04-12_12-38_fc3a3a8ff221_migrate_filter_sets_to_new_format.py:122:21: PERF403 Use a dictionary comprehension instead of a for-loop
- superset/migrations/versions/2022-04-01_14-38_a9422eeaae74_new_dataset_models_take_2.py:795:21: PERF403 Use `dict.update` instead of a for-loop
+ superset/migrations/versions/2022-04-01_14-38_a9422eeaae74_new_dataset_models_take_2.py:795:21: PERF403 Use a dictionary comprehension instead of a for-loop

pandas-dev/pandas (+2 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --no-fix --output-format concise --preview

+ pandas/tests/arrays/sparse/test_accessor.py:247:30: RUF043 Pattern passed to `match=` contains metacharacters but is neither escaped nor raw
+ pandas/tests/arrays/sparse/test_accessor.py:96:50: RUF043 Pattern passed to `match=` contains metacharacters but is neither escaped nor raw

Changes by rule (2 rules affected)

code	total	+ violation	- violation	+ fix	- fix
PERF403	12	6	6	0	0
RUF043	2	2	0	0	0

[ML719]

Chosing to myself for my boundary,no third party API , only me