Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Apply out of sync option only #533

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2023

Conversation

pasha-codefresh
Copy link
Member

@pasha-codefresh pasha-codefresh commented Jul 20, 2023

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 20, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 20, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (425d65e) 55.63% compared to head (e680b67) 55.63%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #533   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.63%   55.63%           
=======================================
  Files          41       41           
  Lines        4553     4553           
=======================================
  Hits         2533     2533           
  Misses       1825     1825           
  Partials      195      195           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/sync/common/types.go 54.16% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@pasha-codefresh
Copy link
Member Author

@crenshaw-dev crenshaw-dev merged commit ed7c77a into master Aug 9, 2023
5 checks passed
@crenshaw-dev crenshaw-dev deleted the feat/apply-out-of-sync-only branch August 9, 2023 13:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants