Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add AttachStructOps() #476
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat: add AttachStructOps() #476
Changes from 9 commits
44c47d8
530f133
4128a80
6097d8a
387280e
180688c
135f18c
0d6fb45
8eac639
144b6cc
9cc4bae
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to take care of this pointer as
bpf_link__detach_struct_ops()
receives it, so AttachStructOps() should return a *BPFLink.P.S.:
bpf_link__detach_struct_ops()
wrapper should be implemented as well. Take a look at the BPFLink type - currently it holds and handles only BPFProg, but you might change it to accomodate a BPFMap as well, I believe.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @geyslan
bpf_link__detach_struct_ops is not public API in the current, do you have any idea on how to handle this?
thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right, it's not indeed. Well, you may have access to it by using link.detach func pointer as bpf_link is returned with it assigned to our bpf_link__detach_struct_ops.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@geyslan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8211f/8211fa4509efc0f025f6c68b6a9742f3e4f56065" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b81e1/b81e17684b7f3f9d7ebc4a522f2ba88513e48aac" alt="image"
If my understanding is correct, the
bpf_link__detach_struct_ops()
will be invoked whenlink.Destroy()
called.So we don't need to add wrapped function for detaching strectOps map, right?