Closed
Conversation
mohanarpit
approved these changes
Jun 16, 2021
hetunandu
requested changes
Jun 16, 2021
Member
hetunandu
left a comment
hetunandu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Read the API response and assert that instead of hard coding the name
mohanarpit
reviewed
Jun 16, 2021
...ypress/integration/Smoke_TestSuite/ClientSideTests/Binding/Bind_API_with_List_Widget_spec.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
arslanhaiderbuttar
approved these changes
Jun 16, 2021
Member
|
I've marked this PR as draft so that it doesn't get merged by mistake as it'll cause test failures to happen on our main branches. |
yatinappsmith
approved these changes
Jun 16, 2021
Member
|
@NandanAnantharamu Closing this PR as it's not the right solve for the problem. Instead of asserting a hard-coded response, we should assert the API response directly. |
yatinappsmith
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2024
## Description EE PR: [Appsmith EE Pull Request #5158](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/5158) Root Cause Analysis (RCA): The `updateCodeInput` function was identified as a source of flakiness due to improper execution. Additionally, the `SaveLocalStorageCache` caused issues by retaining the reset button after the 6th test case, resulting in a duplicate button in the 7th test case, which led to test failures. Solution: Replaced `updateCodeInput` with `EnterJSContext` from `agHelper` for more reliable execution. For the second flaky step, a new page was created, and a table with relevant data was added. This resolved the issue without requiring significant changes to the test case or workflow. Fixes #`36365` ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.ImportExport" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10940196158> > Commit: 32d1be4 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10940196158&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.ImportExport` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:01:32 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Bug Fixes** - Adjusted the inline editing test suite for the table widget to improve state management between tests. - **New Features** - Updated the limited tests to focus on inline editing functionality, enhancing testing priorities for the Table V2 widget. - Introduced new properties in the widget locators to enhance UI interactions, including selectors for various controls and elements within the property pane and cell editing functionalities. - Added a new JavaScript toggle selector to facilitate interactions in tests. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Shivam-z
pushed a commit
to Shivam-z/appsmith
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2024
## Description EE PR: [Appsmith EE Pull Request appsmithorg#5158](https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/5158) Root Cause Analysis (RCA): The `updateCodeInput` function was identified as a source of flakiness due to improper execution. Additionally, the `SaveLocalStorageCache` caused issues by retaining the reset button after the 6th test case, resulting in a duplicate button in the 7th test case, which led to test failures. Solution: Replaced `updateCodeInput` with `EnterJSContext` from `agHelper` for more reliable execution. For the second flaky step, a new page was created, and a table with relevant data was added. This resolved the issue without requiring significant changes to the test case or workflow. Fixes #`36365` ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.ImportExport" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10940196158> > Commit: 32d1be4 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10940196158&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.ImportExport` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:01:32 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Bug Fixes** - Adjusted the inline editing test suite for the table widget to improve state management between tests. - **New Features** - Updated the limited tests to focus on inline editing functionality, enhancing testing priorities for the Table V2 widget. - Introduced new properties in the widget locators to enhance UI interactions, including selectors for various controls and elements within the property pane and cell editing functionalities. - Added a new JavaScript toggle selector to facilitate interactions in tests. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Data from backend changed hence updated the test
Test coverage results 🧪
⚪ Total coverage has not changed
No changes to code coverage between the base branch and the head branch