Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request updates the evaluation process within the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant ET as evalTree
participant DS as DataTreeEvaluator
participant LS as Lodash Functions
ET->>ET: Initialize isUpdateTree = false
ET->>ET: Set isUpdateTree = true
ET->>DS: Retrieve previous state
DS->>LS: Use get() to fetch deep copy values
LS-->>DS: Return deep copied values
DS->>ET: Update dataTree with copied values
ET->>ET: Reset isUpdateTree = false
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/client/src/workers/Evaluation/handlers/evalTree.ts (1)
250-252: Remove commented out codeRather than keeping commented out code, it would be better to remove it entirely if it's no longer needed. If this change is confirmed to work correctly, the old implementation should be deleted.
- // dataTree = makeEntityConfigsAsObjProperties(dataTreeEvaluator.evalTree, { - // evalProps: dataTreeEvaluator.evalProps, - // });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/client/src/workers/Evaluation/handlers/evalTree.ts(5 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: perform-test / client-build / client-build
- GitHub Check: perform-test / server-build / server-unit-tests
- GitHub Check: perform-test / rts-build / build
- GitHub Check: client-unit-tests / client-unit-tests
- GitHub Check: client-prettier / prettier-check
- GitHub Check: client-check-cyclic-deps / check-cyclic-dependencies
- GitHub Check: client-lint / client-lint
- GitHub Check: client-build / client-build
🔇 Additional comments (5)
app/client/src/workers/Evaluation/handlers/evalTree.ts (5)
38-39: New dependencies added for object manipulationThe addition of
get,setfrom lodash andklonafor deep cloning indicates a shift in how object properties are being accessed and copied. These are appropriate utilities for the implementation.
74-74: New control flag for tree updatesA new boolean variable
isUpdateTreehas been introduced to track when the evaluation tree is being updated. This flag is properly initialized.
249-249: Setting update flag before tree processingThe
isUpdateTreeflag is set to true at the appropriate point in the evaluation cycle, right after the sub-tree evaluation.
327-357: New deep-copy implementation for updating previous stateThis implementation selectively deep copies only the necessary paths from the evaluation tree instead of recreating the entire tree. A few observations:
- The code properly handles error objects by cloning them with
klona- It efficiently updates only paths in
completeEvalOrder- It properly sets the resulting modified state as the new
dataTreeThe approach should be more efficient than rebuilding the entire tree structure.
370-370: Properly reset update flagThe
isUpdateTreeflag is correctly reset to ensure it doesn't carry over to subsequent evaluation cycles.
|
/build-deploy-preview skip-tests=true |
|
Deploying Your Preview: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/14279911898. |
|
Deploy-Preview-URL: https://ce-40100.dp.appsmith.com |
|
/build-deploy-preview skip-tests=true |
|
Deploying Your Preview: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/14305143112. |
|
Deploy-Preview-URL: https://ce-40100.dp.appsmith.com |
|
This PR has not seen activitiy for a while. It will be closed in 7 days unless further activity is detected. |
|
This PR has been closed because of inactivity. |
Description
Tip
Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).
Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.
Fixes #
Issue Numberor
Fixes
Issue URLWarning
If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
🔍 Cypress test results
Caution
🔴 🔴 🔴 Some tests have failed.
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/14307341442
Commit: dd0af5a
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.All
Spec:
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
- cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/ExplorerTests/Admin_settings_2_spec.js
- cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/MobileResponsiveTests/AutoDimension_2_spec.ts
- cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/MobileResponsiveTests/AutoHeight_Container_spec.ts
- cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/MobileResponsiveTests/AutoHeight_Form_spec.ts
- cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/MobileResponsiveTests/AutoHeight_Modal_spec.ts
- cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/MobileResponsiveTests/AutoHeight_Tabs_spec.ts
- cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/TableV2/freeze_column_query_change_spec.js
List of identified flaky tests.Mon, 07 Apr 2025 12:17:02 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit