Merged
Conversation
Contributor
WalkthroughThis change updates the error suppression comment in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/client/src/components/formControls/FunctionCallingConfigControl/components/selectors.ts (1)
109-110: Consider using@ts-expect-errorinstead of@ts-ignore.The
@ts-expect-errordirective is preferred over@ts-ignoreas it provides better type checking. If the type error is fixed in the future,@ts-expect-errorwill generate an error, helping us clean up unnecessary suppressions.Apply this diff to improve type checking:
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment -// @ts-ignore assignRequest doesn't exist in CE repo but added in EE repo +// @ts-expect-error assignRequest doesn't exist in CE repo but added in EE repo
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/client/src/components/formControls/FunctionCallingConfigControl/components/selectors.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: client-check-cyclic-deps / check-cyclic-dependencies
- GitHub Check: client-unit-tests / client-unit-tests
- GitHub Check: client-build / client-build
- GitHub Check: client-lint / client-lint
- GitHub Check: client-prettier / prettier-check
trishaanand
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2025
This was referenced Feb 21, 2025
Merged
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to Zeral-Zhang/appsmith
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 12, 2025
## Description > [!TIP] > _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._ > > _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._ Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated internal error handling annotations to align with current linting rules. These adjustments standardize the codebase and maintenance practices without affecting application functionality. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Tip
Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).
Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.
Fixes #
Issue Numberor
Fixes
Issue URLWarning
If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.
Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
🔍 Cypress test results
Caution
If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR.
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit