Skip to content

fix: fix for js visual spec snapshots#39154

Merged
sagar-qa007 merged 3 commits intoreleasefrom
fix/jsindedentsnapfailurefix
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

fix: fix for js visual spec snapshots#39154
sagar-qa007 merged 3 commits intoreleasefrom
fix/jsindedentsnapfailurefix

Conversation

@sagar-qa007
Copy link
Contributor

@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 commented Feb 10, 2025

Description

Tip

Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).

Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.

Fixes #Issue Number
or
Fixes Issue URL

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Visual"

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13241157151
Commit: ff46214
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.Visual
Spec:


Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:07:54 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a comment to the internal testing instructions that does not impact existing functionality.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request adds a single comment line #sample at the end of the limited-tests.txt file. No existing test instructions or logic have been altered, and the file retains its previous content regarding running limited tests and using the ci-test-limit command.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt Appended a new comment #sample at the end.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

skip-changelog

Suggested reviewers

  • ApekshaBhosale
  • yatinappsmith

Poem

In a file where tests align,
A tiny change begins to shine.
A fresh comment, clear and light,
Marks the end with pure insight,
Code smiles softly in its design.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sagar-qa007
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ci-test-limit-count run_count=1 update_snapshot=true specs_to_run=ccypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorIndent_spec.js,cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorSaveAndAutoIndent_spec.js,cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorComment_spec.js

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Bug Something isn't working label Feb 10, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13239963369.
Cypress dashboard: Click here!
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
To know the list of identified flaky tests - Refer here

***** Repeat Run Summary ***** Total Tests with repeat: 2 Total Passed: 2 Total Failed: 0 Total Skipped: 0 *****************************

@sagar-qa007
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ci-test-limit-count run_count=1 update_snapshot=true specs_to_run=cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorIndent_spec.js,cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorSaveAndAutoIndent_spec.js,cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorComment_spec.js runId=13239963369

@github-actions
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13240420621.
Cypress dashboard: Click here!
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
To know the list of identified flaky tests - Refer here

***** Repeat Run Summary ***** Total Tests with repeat: 10 Total Passed: 10 Total Failed: 0 Total Skipped: 0 *****************************

@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Feb 10, 2025
@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 changed the title fix: minor update fix: fix for js visual spec snapshots Feb 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1)

7-7: Grammar Improvement Suggestion

The new comment on line 7 could be refined for clarity by adding the appropriate article. For example, consider updating the line to:

-#ci-test-limit uses this file to run minimum of specs. Do not run entire suite with this command.
+#ci-test-limit uses this file to run the minimum number of specs. Do not run the entire suite with this command.

This change improves readability and makes the instruction clearer.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~7-~7: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...ile to run minimum of specs. Do not run entire suite with this command.

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a24efa2 and ff46214.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (14)
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorComment_spec.js/jsObjAfterCommenting1.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorComment_spec.js/jsObjBeforeCommenting1.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorIndent_spec.js/formattedJSONBodyAfterSave.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorIndent_spec.js/jsObjAfterGoLineStartSmart5.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorIndent_spec.js/jsObjAfterPrettify1.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorIndent_spec.js/jsObjAfterPrettify3.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorIndent_spec.js/jsObjAfterPrettify4.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorIndent_spec.js/jsObjBeforeGoLineStartSmart5.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorIndent_spec.js/jsObjBeforePrettify1.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorIndent_spec.js/jsObjBeforePrettify3.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorIndent_spec.js/jsObjBeforePrettify4.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorIndent_spec.js/jsObjBeforePrettify6.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorIndent_spec.js/jsObjBeforePrettify7.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • app/client/cypress/snapshots/Regression/ClientSide/VisualTests/JSEditorSaveAndAutoIndent_spec.js/jsObjBeforeSaveAndPrettify.snap.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`app/client/cypress/**/**.*`: Review the following e2e test ...

app/client/cypress/**/**.*: Review the following e2e test code written using the Cypress test library. Ensure that:

  • Follow best practices for Cypress code and e2e automation.
  • Avoid using cy.wait in code.
  • Avoid using cy.pause in code.
  • Avoid using agHelper.sleep().
  • Use locator variables for locators and do not use plain strings.
  • Use data-* attributes for selectors.
  • Avoid Xpaths, Attributes and CSS path.
  • Avoid selectors like .btn.submit or button[type=submit].
  • Perform logins via API with LoginFromAPI.
  • Perform logout via API with LogOutviaAPI.
  • Perform signup via API with SignupFromAPI.
  • Avoid using it.only.
  • Avoid using after and aftereach in test cases.
  • Use multiple assertions for expect statements.
  • Avoid using strings for assertions.
  • Do not use duplicate filenames even with different paths.
  • Avoid using agHelper.Sleep, this.Sleep in any file in code.
  • app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt
🪛 LanguageTool
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt

[uncategorized] ~7-~7: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...ile to run minimum of specs. Do not run entire suite with this command.

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: perform-test / client-build / client-build
  • GitHub Check: perform-test / server-build / server-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: perform-test / rts-build / build
  • GitHub Check: client-unit-tests / client-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: client-lint / client-lint
  • GitHub Check: client-build / client-build
  • GitHub Check: client-prettier / prettier-check

Copy link
Collaborator

@btsgh btsgh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR fetches the new snapshots

@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 merged commit 53b8bc8 into release Feb 10, 2025
47 checks passed
@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 deleted the fix/jsindedentsnapfailurefix branch February 10, 2025 14:11
github-actions bot pushed a commit to Zeral-Zhang/appsmith that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
## Description
> [!TIP]  
> _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or
extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._
>
> _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any
dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion,
Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._


Fixes #`Issue Number`  
_or_  
Fixes `Issue URL`
> [!WARNING]  
> _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the
maintainers if the issue is valid._

## Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Visual"

### 🔍 Cypress test results
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->
> [!TIP]
> 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
> Workflow run:
<https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13241157151>
> Commit: ff46214
> <a
href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13241157151&attempt=1"
target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>.
> Tags: `@tag.Visual`
> Spec:
> <hr>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:07:54 UTC
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results  -->


## Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Chores**
- Added a comment to the internal testing instructions that does not
impact existing functionality.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 28, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Bug Something isn't working ok-to-test Required label for CI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants