chore: integrate file association query API for Appsmith API#39098
chore: integrate file association query API for Appsmith API#39098
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request extends control functionalities by introducing a new optional Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant FC as FormControl
participant FCR as FormControlRegistry
participant RDS as RagDocumentsSelector
FC->>FCR: Call createControl(config with actionId)
FCR->>RDS: Invoke buildPropertyControl(controlProps)
RDS-->>FCR: Return JSX.Element (control component)
FCR-->>FC: Return constructed control component
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
skip-changelog
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/client/src/utils/formControl/FormControlRegistry.tsx (1)
214-227: Add type annotation for controlProps parameterThe buildPropertyControl method should specify the type for controlProps parameter to maintain consistency with other control builders.
- buildPropertyControl(controlProps): JSX.Element { + buildPropertyControl(controlProps: ControlProps): JSX.Element {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
app/client/src/components/formControls/BaseControl.tsx(1 hunks)app/client/src/ee/components/formControls/Rag/RagDocumentsSelector.tsx(1 hunks)app/client/src/ee/components/formControls/Rag/index.ts(1 hunks)app/client/src/pages/Editor/FormControl.tsx(1 hunks)app/client/src/utils/formControl/FormControlRegistry.tsx(2 hunks)app/client/src/utils/formControl/formControlTypes.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: client-prettier / prettier-check
- GitHub Check: client-unit-tests / client-unit-tests
- GitHub Check: client-check-cyclic-deps / check-cyclic-dependencies
- GitHub Check: client-build / client-build
- GitHub Check: client-lint / client-lint
🔇 Additional comments (8)
app/client/src/ee/components/formControls/Rag/index.ts (1)
3-3: LGTM!Export statement follows the established pattern.
app/client/src/ee/components/formControls/Rag/RagDocumentsSelector.tsx (2)
1-5: LGTM!Interface is well-defined with appropriate optional string properties.
7-11: Component needs implementation.The component is currently a stub returning null. Please ensure implementation is added in a follow-up PR.
Would you like me to help create a task to track the implementation of this component?
app/client/src/utils/formControl/formControlTypes.ts (1)
24-24: LGTM!New control type follows the established pattern.
app/client/src/components/formControls/BaseControl.tsx (1)
114-114: LGTM!The actionId property is appropriately typed and follows the established pattern.
app/client/src/pages/Editor/FormControl.tsx (2)
187-187: LGTM: actionId prop additionThe actionId is correctly passed to the FormControlFactory.createControl.
264-269: Verify memo comparison impact on performanceThe addition of disabled prop comparison in memo is logical but might affect component re-rendering frequency.
✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for disabled prop usage patterns ast-grep --pattern 'disabled={$_}'Length of output: 36
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Re-run a search for 'config.disabled' in the FormControl.tsx file to inspect its usage context. rg 'config.disabled' -n app/client/src/pages/Editor/FormControl.tsxLength of output: 184
Memo Comparison Check: Minimal Impact but Verify Prop Stability
The additional check for
config.disabledis very lightweight. However, note that if the parent always passes new prop objects (i.e., non-stable references), the memo’s first reference check (prevProps === nextProps) will fail consistently regardless of the disabled value—even whenconfig.disabledremains unchanged. In such cases, the intended performance benefits of memoization might not be realized.
- Ensure parent components pass stable (or memoized) prop objects if you want to leverage memoization.
- The disabled check itself does not pose a meaningful performance overhead.
app/client/src/utils/formControl/FormControlRegistry.tsx (1)
40-43: LGTM: Clean import structureThe imports are well-organized and follow the existing pattern.
…horg#39098) /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity" Corresponding CE files for EE PR <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced enhanced control features by adding an optional action identifier, providing greater context for interactions. - Added a new document selection control type, expanding available form control options in the editor. - **Refactor** - Improved control rendering performance by refining the update logic to better handle state changes such as disabled status. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13183325897> > Commit: c645c5c > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=13183325897&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 17:39:42 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results -->
2 participants
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
Corresponding CE files for EE PR
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13183325897
Commit: c645c5c
Cypress dashboard.
Tags:
@tag.SanitySpec:
Thu, 06 Feb 2025 17:39:42 UTC