Skip to content

[DO NOT MERGE]: Chore/code split jit app ci cd v2#38332

Closed
subrata71 wants to merge 4 commits intoreleasefrom
chore/code-split-jit-app-ci-cd-v2
Closed

[DO NOT MERGE]: Chore/code split jit app ci cd v2#38332
subrata71 wants to merge 4 commits intoreleasefrom
chore/code-split-jit-app-ci-cd-v2

Conversation

@subrata71
Copy link
Collaborator

@subrata71 subrata71 commented Dec 23, 2024

Description

Tip

Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).

Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.

Fixes #Issue Number
or
Fixes Issue URL

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12470987928
Commit: c9f02dc
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.Sanity
Spec:


Mon, 23 Dec 2024 18:57:26 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a method to validate and publish artifacts, enhancing the publishing process.
    • Added a method for committing artifacts with customizable commit messages.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved validation checks before publishing artifacts after discarding changes.
  • Documentation

    • Updated documentation to reflect new methods and changes in artifact handling processes.

@subrata71 subrata71 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 23, 2024 18:03
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new method validateAndPublishArtifact in the GitApplicationHelperCEImpl class, which extends the artifact publishing process. The changes span multiple files in the Appsmith server's Git-related components, focusing on enhancing artifact validation and publishing mechanisms. The modifications include adding a new method to the GitArtifactHelperCE interface, updating the discardChanges method in CommonGitServiceCEImpl, and introducing a commitArtifact method in the GitFileSystemTestHelper class.

Changes

File Change Summary
.../GitApplicationHelperCEImpl.java Added validateAndPublishArtifact method to validate and publish artifacts
.../CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java Updated discardChanges method to use new validateAndPublishArtifact
.../GitArtifactHelperCE.java Added new interface method validateAndPublishArtifact
.../GitFileSystemTestHelper.java Added commitArtifact method for more flexible Git artifact commits

Possibly related PRs

Suggested Labels

skip-changelog, ok-to-test, Enhancement, Task, Git Product

Suggested Reviewers

  • nidhi-nair
  • sondermanish

Poem

🌿 Git's gentle dance of code and change,
Artifacts validated, now rearrange!
Publish with care, each line refined,
Where validation and progress are intertwined 🚀
A symphony of commits, pure and bright! 💻

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@subrata71 subrata71 added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Dec 23, 2024
@subrata71 subrata71 removed the request for review from a team December 23, 2024 18:03
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/GitArtifactHelperCE.java (1)

71-72: Prefer returning the concrete artifact type rather than a wildcard.

Returning "Mono" instead of "Mono<? extends Artifact>" may improve clarity for callers.

app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/testhelpers/git/GitFileSystemTestHelper.java (2)

67-69: Use descriptive commit messages to ease debugging.

The message "commit message two" is not very meaningful. Consider providing more context in commit messages.


70-77: Consider reducing the parameter list or using a builder.

This method signature has many parameters, which can be error-prone and less maintainable.

app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/git/GitApplicationHelperCEImpl.java (1)

325-329: Expose meaningful validation checks in validateAndPublishArtifact.

Currently, the method delegates to publishArtifact. Implement additional validations if necessary.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5855115 and c9f02dc.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/git/GitApplicationHelperCEImpl.java (1 hunks)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/common/CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java (1 hunks)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/GitArtifactHelperCE.java (1 hunks)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/testhelpers/git/GitFileSystemTestHelper.java (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/testhelpers/git/GitFileSystemTestHelper.java (2)

78-78: Validate the path before usage.

If workspaceId or repoName is invalid, ensure that an exception is handled properly.


87-87: Check commit outcome for potential errors.

Be sure to handle unexpected failures from commitArtifact() to maintain consistency in tests.

app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/common/CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java (1)

2295-2296: Confirm sufficient validation coverage before publishing.

Replacing publishArtifact with validateAndPublishArtifact suggests a stricter check. Ensure all essential validations are performed here.

@github-actions
Copy link

Failed server tests

  • com.appsmith.server.services.ce.ApplicationServiceCETest#validChangeViewAccessCancelledMidWay

@subrata71 subrata71 closed this Dec 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ok-to-test Required label for CI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant