test: Fix failure in API_Bugs_Spec.js

[sharat87]

Automation

/test
cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/ApiTests/API_Bugs_Spec.js

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12061903753
Commit: e3db469
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: ``
Spec: cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/ApiTests/API_Bugs_Spec.js

---

Thu, 28 Nov 2024 03:45:53 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

• Yes
• No

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Adjusted the test case for Bug 5550 to correctly validate the image source for cocktails in the API response.
  • Ensured continued coverage of various API functionality bugs through existing tests.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Cypress end-to-end test suite for API bugs, specifically in the API_Bugs_Spec.js file. The primary adjustment is the alteration of the index used to select an image source for a cocktail, changing from the third image to the second. This reflects a shift in the expected order of elements in the DOM while maintaining the overall structure and intent of the existing test cases related to API functionality.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/ApiTests/API_Bugs_Spec.js	Adjusted image index from .eq(2) to .eq(1) for cocktail validation in Bug 5550 test case.

Possibly related PRs

• test: fix flaky case for forkapp #35376: Modifies a test specification in a Cypress test file, potentially relating to the overall structure and functionality of test cases.
• test: replace 3rd party API1 CE #36518: Involves changes to a Cypress test script focusing on API functionality, indicating a connection in testing API responses.
• test: udpated 3rd party api for Commandclick nav spec #36545: Updates a test specification related to command click navigation, sharing similarities in testing methodologies with the current PR.

Suggested reviewers

• ApekshaBhosale
• sagar-qa007

🎉 In the land of code where bugs do roam,
A test was tweaked to find its home.
From third to second, the image did sway,
Validations updated, come what may!
With Cypress in hand, the tests now align,
Cheers to the changes, all will be fine! 🍹

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.