chore: Updating some states related to action execution#36801
chore: Updating some states related to action execution#36801nidhi-nair merged 3 commits intoreleasefrom
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
skip-changelog
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/PluginActionContext.tsx (1)
31-51: A suggestion for extra credit: Add some explanatory comments!Great job on making these focused changes! To make your code even more understandable for your classmates, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of
actionResponsein this context. For example:// actionResponse: Contains the result of the most recent action executionThis will help future developers (or yourself when you come back to this code later) understand why this property is important in the context. Remember, good documentation is like leaving clear instructions for a substitute teacher!
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionToolbar.tsx (1)
20-22: Class, let's examine this new function, shall we?Now, children, we have a new function called
onRunClick. Can anyone tell me what it does? That's right, it simply callshandleRunClick.While this abstraction might seem unnecessary at first glance, it's actually a good practice. It gives us a clear, named function for our button's click handler. This can make our code more readable and easier to understand.
However, we must ask ourselves: is this abstraction truly needed? If we don't plan to add more logic to
onRunClickin the future, it might be overkill.So, class, what do you think? Should we keep this function or simplify our code? Let's have a thoughtful discussion about the pros and cons.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/PluginActionContext.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionToolbar.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/client/src/ce/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/hooks/usePluginActionResponseTabs.tsx (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (13)
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/PluginActionContext.tsx (3)
31-39: Well done, class! You've correctly updated the props destructuring.I'm pleased to see that you've added
actionResponseto the list of destructured props. This change allows us to pass the action response data through our context, which is an excellent way to share this information with child components. Remember, sharing is caring in React!
45-51: Excellent work on updating the context value and dependencies!Class, pay attention to how
actionResponsehas been added both to thecontextValueobject and the dependency array ofuseMemo. This is a crucial step in React context management. By includingactionResponsein the context, we're making it available to all the components that consume this context. And by adding it to the dependency array, we're ensuring that our context value is recalculated whenever the action response changes. This is like updating our class bulletin board whenever we have new information!
Line range hint
1-78: Class dismissed with an A+ for this assignment!You've done an excellent job updating the
PluginActionContextto include theactionResponse. Your changes are consistent, focused, and enhance the functionality of the context provider. The addition ofactionResponseto the context will allow child components to access this important information easily.Remember, clear communication is key in both coding and teaching. Consider adding some comments to explain the purpose of new additions like
actionResponse. This will make your code even more accessible to your fellow developers.Keep up the great work, and don't forget to raise your hand if you have any questions!
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionToolbar.tsx (1)
34-34: Excellent update to our button's click handler!Class, pay attention to line 34. We've updated our "Run" button's
onClickhandler to use our newonRunClickfunction. This is a perfect example of how we can improve code readability.By using a clearly named function like
onRunClick, anyone reading our code can immediately understand what this button does when clicked. It's like labeling our desk drawers - it makes everything easier to find and understand!Remember, good code isn't just about functionality; it's also about clarity. This change doesn't alter what the button does, but it makes our intentions crystal clear. Well done!
app/client/src/ce/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/hooks/usePluginActionResponseTabs.tsx (9)
22-25: Good job adding necessary imports.You have correctly imported
getPluginActionDebuggerStateandisActionRunningfrom"PluginActionEditor/store", which are essential for managing debugger state and action execution status.
33-37: Well done incorporating additional dependencies.Including
useDebuggerTriggerClick,useFeatureFlag,FEATURE_FLAG,getHasExecuteActionPermission, andDEFAULT_DATASOURCE_NAMEenhances the functionality related to debugging, feature flags, permission checks, and constant values.
52-54: Nice work initializingonDebugClickandisRunning.You've properly set up
onDebugClickusinguseDebuggerTriggerClick()and retrievedisRunningwithuseSelector, which will help in handling debugger triggers and monitoring action execution state effectively.
55-60: Effective use of feature flags and permission handling.By utilizing
useFeatureFlagwithFEATURE_FLAG.license_gac_enabledand determiningisExecutePermitted, you've ensured that action execution respects feature enablement and user permissions appropriately.
67-75: Logical conditions are thoughtfully designed.Your implementation of
blockExecutioncorrectly determines when to prevent action execution based on the datasource URL, path, and user permissions. This ensures robust control over action execution flow.
78-81: FunctiononRunClickis properly defined.Defining
onRunClickto callhandleRunClick()encapsulates the run click behavior neatly, promoting code readability and maintainability.
107-109: Props passed toApiResponseare accurate.Passing
isRunDisabled,isRunning, andonRunClickensures that theApiResponsecomponent functions as expected with the updated execution logic, enhancing the user experience.
121-124: Updated props enhanceApiResponseHeadersfunctionality.Including
isRunDisabled,isRunning,onDebugClick, andonRunClickwill improve user interaction with theApiResponseHeaderscomponent, providing better control over debugging and execution.
170-171:QueryResponseTabreceives necessary execution state props.Providing
isRunningandonRunClicktoQueryResponseTabensures it has the required context for action execution, which is essential for accurate response rendering.
.../ce/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/hooks/usePluginActionResponseTabs.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../ce/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/hooks/usePluginActionResponseTabs.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| // if the url is empty and the action's datasource name is the default datasource name (this means the api does not have a datasource attached) | ||
| // or the user does not have permission, | ||
| // we block action execution. | ||
| const blockExecution = | ||
| (!actionDatasourceUrl && | ||
| !actionDatasourceUrlPath && | ||
| actionDatasourceName === DEFAULT_DATASOURCE_NAME) || | ||
| !isExecutePermitted; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is only related to API actions and should be extracted out into its own hook. Also should this condition not be applied at the toolbar run level as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes you're correct. It will be needed there too. Although, I just checked, both Query and Api uses different conditions for blocking execution. Should we return the value from the hook based on action type?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If they rely on completely different logic to decide this, it should be extracted out into separate utils.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've kept it in the same hook because PluginActionToolbar is common between Api and Query and so we will end up having Action type checked there if we have 2 separate hooks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionToolbar.tsx (3 hunks)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/hooks/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/ce/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/hooks/usePluginActionResponseTabs.tsx (5 hunks)
- app/client/src/ce/PluginActionEditor/hooks/useBlockExecution.ts (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/ee/PluginActionEditor/hooks/useBlockExecution.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- app/client/src/ee/PluginActionEditor/hooks/useBlockExecution.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionToolbar.tsx
- app/client/src/ce/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/hooks/usePluginActionResponseTabs.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
app/client/src/ce/PluginActionEditor/hooks/useBlockExecution.ts
[error] 29-29: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/hooks/index.ts (1)
4-4: Excellent addition, class! Let's discuss its significance.Well done on adding the export for the
useBlockExecutionhook. This addition aligns perfectly with our lesson on modular code organization. Can anyone tell me how this new hook might contribute to our action execution flow?Remember, students, when we introduce new hooks like this, it's crucial to consider how they interact with existing functionality. In your homework, I want you to think about how
useBlockExecutionmight work alongsideuseHandleRunClick. Any thoughts on that?
…o chore/update-execution-states
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionToolbar.tsx (3 hunks)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/hooks/index.ts (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/ce/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/hooks/usePluginActionResponseTabs.tsx (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionToolbar.tsx
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/hooks/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/client/src/ce/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/hooks/usePluginActionResponseTabs.tsx (6)
22-25: Excellent inclusion of necessary selectors and state management imports.Adding
getPluginActionDebuggerStateandisActionRunningfrom"PluginActionEditor/store"is a wise step to ensure that the component accurately reflects the current state of the action debugger and running status. This will enhance the responsiveness of your UI based on the action's execution state.
33-36: Thoughtful integration of custom hooks for execution control and analytics.By importing
useBlockExecution,useHandleRunClick, anduseAnalyticsOnRunClickfrom"PluginActionEditor/hooks", you are effectively modularizing the code and promoting reuse. This approach not only simplifies the component but also adheres to best practices in hook utilization.
37-37: Great addition of the debugger trigger hook.Incorporating
useDebuggerTriggerClickenhances the debugging capabilities of your component. This will allow users to seamlessly access debugging features, improving the overall developer experience.
89-90: Verify that theisRunDisabledandisRunningprops are correctly handled inApiResponse.Please ensure that the
ApiResponsecomponent acceptsisRunDisabledandisRunningas props and utilizes them appropriately to reflect the action's execution state and control the run functionality.
103-105: Confirm prop compatibility withApiResponseHeaders.It's important to verify that
ApiResponseHeaderscan handle the new propsisRunDisabled,isRunning, andonDebugClick. This will ensure that the component behaves as expected when the action's execution is blocked or in progress, and when the debug functionality is triggered.
152-152: EnsureisRunningprop is utilized correctly inQueryResponseTab.Double-check that the
QueryResponseTabcomponent is designed to accept theisRunningprop and that it uses this prop to manage its internal state or UI elements accordingly.
.../ce/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/hooks/usePluginActionResponseTabs.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
3 participants
Description
Updating some states related to action execution under modularised flow: isRunning, isRunDisabled, onDebugClick, actionResponse.
Fixes #36802
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
🔍 Cypress test results
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11275569168
Commit: 2b23612
Cypress dashboard.
Tags:
@tag.SanitySpec:
Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:38:26 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation