Skip to content

TESTING EXTERNAL SCRIPT: external merge request from Contributor#36352

Closed
jacquesikot wants to merge 4 commits intoreleasefrom
chore/external-contribution-34715
Closed

TESTING EXTERNAL SCRIPT: external merge request from Contributor#36352
jacquesikot wants to merge 4 commits intoreleasefrom
chore/external-contribution-34715

Conversation

@jacquesikot
Copy link
Contributor

@jacquesikot jacquesikot commented Sep 17, 2024

Description

Fixes #

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10894786986
Commit: dcb2e0d
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.All
Spec:


Tue, 17 Sep 2024 02:36:09 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced validation for the PhoneInput widget to prevent invalid input.
    • Toast message handling improved to ensure clarity in user feedback during input changes.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved test robustness by ensuring toast messages are properly displayed and removed during validation checks.

@jacquesikot jacquesikot added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Sep 17, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduced enhance the functionality and robustness of the PhoneInput component and its associated tests. Specifically, input validation has been added to ensure that the PhoneInput does not accept invalid characters or leading whitespace. Additionally, the test suite for the PhoneInput component has been updated to include validation for the toast message that indicates a value change, ensuring it is properly displayed and removed during the test flow.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/PhoneInput/PhoneInput_Part2_spec.ts Added validation steps in the test for the PhoneInput component, including checks for toast message visibility after input changes.
app/client/src/widgets/PhoneInputWidget/widget/index.tsx Introduced input validation using regular expressions in the PhoneInputWidget class to prevent invalid data from being processed.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant PhoneInputWidget
    participant ToastMessage

    User->>PhoneInputWidget: Input value
    PhoneInputWidget->>PhoneInputWidget: Validate input
    alt Valid input
        PhoneInputWidget->>PhoneInputWidget: Update metadata
        PhoneInputWidget->>ToastMessage: Show "Value Changed"
    else Invalid input
        PhoneInputWidget->>User: Reject input
    end
    User->>PhoneInputWidget: Clear input
    PhoneInputWidget->>ToastMessage: Wait for disappearance
    ToastMessage-->>PhoneInputWidget: Confirm disappearance
Loading

Poem

In the realm of code, a change took flight,
Validations added, making things right.
Toasts that appear, then fade away,
Ensuring our inputs are here to stay.
With each little tweak, our tests grow strong,
In the world of widgets, we all belong! 🎉


Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5dfbe8c and dcb2e0d.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/PhoneInput/PhoneInput_Part2_spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/client/src/widgets/PhoneInputWidget/widget/index.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/PhoneInput/PhoneInput_Part2_spec.ts (1)

Pattern app/client/cypress/**/**.*: Review the following e2e test code written using the Cypress test library. Ensure that:

  • Follow best practices for Cypress code and e2e automation.
  • Avoid using cy.wait in code.
  • Avoid using cy.pause in code.
  • Avoid using agHelper.sleep().
  • Use locator variables for locators and do not use plain strings.
  • Use data-* attributes for selectors.
  • Avoid Xpaths, Attributes and CSS path.
  • Avoid selectors like .btn.submit or button[type=submit].
  • Perform logins via API with LoginFromAPI.
  • Perform logout via API with LogOutviaAPI.
  • Perform signup via API with SignupFromAPI.
  • Avoid using it.only.
  • Avoid using after and aftereach in test cases.
  • Use multiple assertions for expect statements.
  • Avoid using strings for assertions.
  • Do not use duplicate filenames even with different paths.
  • Avoid using agHelper.Sleep, this.Sleep in any file in code.
Additional comments not posted (2)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/PhoneInput/PhoneInput_Part2_spec.ts (1)

295-297: Excellent work! The additional validation steps enhance the test's robustness.

The changes ensure that the toast message is not only displayed but also properly removed before the next action is taken. This improves the accuracy of the test flow.

Using cy.get(locators._toastMsg).should("not.exist") to assert the absence of the toast message aligns with Cypress best practices.

app/client/src/widgets/PhoneInputWidget/widget/index.tsx (1)

414-425: Excellent work on adding input validation! 👍

The regular expression effectively ensures that the input meets the expected format, preventing invalid characters from being processed. This validation step enhances the robustness of the PhoneInputWidget and maintains data integrity.

By skipping the update for invalid input, you've ensured that the widget's state remains consistent and avoids potential issues caused by malformed data.

Keep up the great work in improving the reliability and user experience of the PhoneInputWidget! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jacquesikot jacquesikot added ok-to-test Required label for CI and removed ok-to-test Required label for CI labels Sep 17, 2024
@AmanAgarwal041
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this PR to test the script.

@AmanAgarwal041 AmanAgarwal041 deleted the chore/external-contribution-34715 branch September 17, 2024 12:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ok-to-test Required label for CI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants