Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml Files selected for processing (1)
Additional comments not posted (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Failed server tests
|
## Description Sorry forgot to add the null check in my previous PR appsmithorg@4c7ce27 /test Sanity ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10881430163> > Commit: c6d853a > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=10881430163&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Sanity` > Spec: > <hr>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:11:20 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [x] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Bug Fixes** - Improved error handling in the permissions system by adding a null check for policies, preventing potential crashes. - **Refactor** - Enhanced the robustness of the permission checking method to ensure stability when handling null inputs. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Description
Sorry forgot to add the null check in my previous PR 4c7ce27
/test Sanity
🔍 Cypress test results
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10881430163
Commit: c6d853a
Cypress dashboard.
Tags:
@tag.SanitySpec:
Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:11:20 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit