Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes involve the removal of the Changes
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (2)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Additional context usedBiome
Additional comments not posted (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/client/src/ce/api/ApplicationApi.tsx (2)
Line range hint
168-168: Replaceanytype with more specific types to improve type safety.- Promise<any> + Promise<SpecificType> // Replace `SpecificType` with the actual expected typeAlso applies to: 177-177, 307-307
Line range hint
281-500: Consider refactoring theApplicationApiclass to avoid a class that only contains static methods. This could potentially be a utility module.
This reverts commit dd38743.
Not removing this field from Cypress test resources, so that we continue to test with past export files.
/test all
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9344945556
Commit: b97cece
Cypress dashboard url: Click here!