Structured Concurrency compliant MTELG create/shutdown #3296
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Lukasa
reviewed
Jul 11, 2025
weissi
force-pushed
the
jw-sc-mtelg
branch
4 times, most recently
from
ed2df3f to
a0c8b6c
Compare
Lukasa
approved these changes
Jul 11, 2025
weissi
force-pushed
the
jw-sc-mtelg
branch
2 times, most recently
from
100719b to
b2bb2d0
Compare
|
I will split this PR in two:
|
zaneenders
pushed a commit
to zaneenders/swift-nio
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2025
### Motivation: Structured Concurrency is helpful but so far, MTELG was very difficult to use with it mostly because Swift is still missing `async` in `defer`s. This builds on - apple#3297 - apple#3302 - apple#3304 ### Modifications: - Add MTELG.withELG { ... } ### Result: MTELG + SC = <3
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation:
Structured Concurrency is helpful but so far, MTELG was very difficult to use with it mostly because Swift is still missing
asyncindefers.This builds on
Modifications:
Result:
MTELG + SC = <3