fix: avoid queueing up repeated config/schema reloads#8336
Merged
Conversation
If you have a big complicated supergraph that takes some time to load, and you edit it multiple times in a short time frame, it causes multiple `notify` events to queue up. These are all handled individually, and all cause a full schema reload. Let's assume I do this. - Start the router. It takes a few seconds to load the initial supergraph schema. - Now I modify the supergraph schema file. This emits a notify event "A". The router starts loading the supergraph schema. - I modify it again. This queues an additional notify event "B". The loop inside files.rs starts spinning until event "A" is handled. - I modify it again. This queues an additional notify event "C". This stays inside the `notify` crate until event "B" is handled. - The router finishes loading the supergraph schema. - Event "A" is now finished, so event "B" can be sent on the channel, and the router starts loading the supergraph schema again. - `notify` sees that the callback for event "B" has completed so it emits event "C". - `files.rs` starts spinning until event "B" is handled. - Finally, when the router has loaded the supergraph again, we emit event "C" and trigger another reload. All the while, the user repeatedly sees a "could not process file watch notification" warning. For events "B" and "C", the supergraph hasn't actually changed.
Contributor
✅ Docs preview has no changesThe preview was not built because there were no changes. Build ID: b1c3fd6f3871516140b573fc |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
BrynCooke
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If you have a big complicated supergraph that takes some time to load,
and you edit it multiple times in a short time frame, it causes multiple
notifyevents to queue up. These are all handled individually, and allcause a full schema reload.
Let's assume I do this.
schema.
loop inside files.rs starts spinning until event "A" is handled.
stays inside the
notifycrate until event "B" is handled.and the router starts loading the supergraph schema again.
notifysees that the callback for event "B" has completed so itemits event "C".
files.rsstarts spinning until event "B" is handled.event "C" and trigger another reload.
All the while, the user repeatedly sees a "could not process file watch
notification" warning.
For events "B" and "C", the supergraph hasn't actually changed.
This PR silences the log error message and prevents trying to loop repeatedly to add another event to a full queue as byt definition there is an event queued already.
Checklist
Complete the checklist (and note appropriate exceptions) before the PR is marked ready-for-review.
Exceptions
Note any exceptions here
No docs or perf testing needed as this is not a change in functionality and it won't affect perf as it is to do with reload.
Notes
Footnotes
It may be appropriate to bring upcoming changes to the attention of other (impacted) groups. Please endeavour to do this before seeking PR approval. The mechanism for doing this will vary considerably, so use your judgement as to how and when to do this. ↩
Configuration is an important part of many changes. Where applicable please try to document configuration examples. ↩
A lot of (if not most) features benefit from built-in observability and
debug-level logs. Please read this guidance on metrics best-practices. ↩Tick whichever testing boxes are applicable. If you are adding Manual Tests, please document the manual testing (extensively) in the Exceptions. ↩