Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add determine single namespace item num limit logic #5227
feat: add determine single namespace item num limit logic #5227
Changes from 6 commits
547af9d
e947e39
0631770
ea19b4e
998459e
597242a
a648d5a
b9fd00b
adba638
c3fe024
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Encapsulate item limit logic within
ItemService
To maintain separation of concerns, consider moving the item count limit check into the
ItemService
. This ensures that all item creation operations adhere to the limit, promoting consistency across the application.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approve new method, but
item.num.limit
implementation is incomplete.The new
findNonEmptyItemCount
method is correctly implemented to count non-empty items in a namespace. However, theitem.num.limit
feature mentioned in the PR objectives is not fully implemented yet.To complete the
item.num.limit
feature:BizConfig
to retrieve theitem.num.limit
value.save
andupdate
to check against this limit before adding or modifying items.Example implementation in the
save
method:Similar checks should be added to other relevant methods.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Batch modification will result in a large number of queries to the DB
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@youngzil, I understand your concern about the potential performance impact when batch modifications result in numerous database queries. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
✏️ Learnings added
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Clarify variable names for better readability
The variables
createItemCount
anddeleteItemCount
represent the number of items to be added and removed. For improved code readability, consider renaming them tonewItemCount
andremovedItemCount
, respectively.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Address potential concurrency issues in item count validation
The current logic for enforcing the item number limit may encounter concurrency issues. If multiple requests modify the namespace items simultaneously, the item count retrieved might be outdated by the time the validation occurs, potentially leading to inconsistent states or exceeding the limit unintentionally.
To ensure consistency and prevent race conditions, consider implementing synchronization mechanisms such as database-level locks, optimistic locking, or wrapping this operation within a transaction with an appropriate isolation level.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Inconsistent image references need attention.
There are inconsistencies in the image references:
Please standardize the image references. If using relative paths, ensure they are correct and consistent throughout the document.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider reorganizing the document structure.
The new section 6.5 is added at the end of section 6. Consider: