Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add syntax check function for yaml namespace #1946

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2019

Conversation

nobodyiam
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 5, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1946 into master will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1946      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     50.86%   50.82%   -0.05%     
  Complexity     1979     1979              
============================================
  Files           398      398              
  Lines         12175    12185      +10     
  Branches       1249     1250       +1     
============================================
  Hits           6193     6193              
- Misses         5524     5534      +10     
  Partials        458      458
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...ework/apollo/portal/controller/ItemController.java 6.32% <0%> (-0.92%) 1 <0> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 41450a5...f545caa. Read the comment docs.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 5, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.04%) to 54.584% when pulling f545caa on nobodyiam:yml-syntax-check into 41450a5 on ctripcorp:master.

@nobodyiam nobodyiam force-pushed the yml-syntax-check branch 5 times, most recently from 3e06442 to af40d50 Compare February 13, 2019 03:26
@nobodyiam nobodyiam merged commit daa1839 into apolloconfig:master Feb 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants