Skip to content

Conversation

@zjffdu
Copy link
Contributor

@zjffdu zjffdu commented May 18, 2020

What is this PR for?

Before this PR, the exported ipynb is always undefined.zepl.ipynb because note name is not passed correctly, this PR fix this issue and the exported ipynb will be {note_name}.ipynb

What type of PR is it?

[Bug Fix]

Todos

  • - Task

What is the Jira issue?

How should this be tested?

  • Manually tested

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Questions:

  • Does the licenses files need update? No
  • Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
  • Does this needs documentation? No

Copy link
Contributor

@alexott alexott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 0b1df00 May 19, 2020
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2020
### What is this PR for?

Before this PR, the exported `ipynb` is always `undefined.zepl.ipynb` because note name is not passed correctly, this PR fix this issue and the exported ipynb will be `{note_name}.ipynb`

### What type of PR is it?
[Bug Fix]

### Todos
* [ ] - Task

### What is the Jira issue?
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-4823

### How should this be tested?
* Manually tested

### Screenshots (if appropriate)

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? No
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
* Does this needs documentation? No

Author: Jeff Zhang <[email protected]>

Closes #3774 from zjffdu/ZEPPELIN-4823 and squashes the following commits:

b5af8aa [Jeff Zhang] [ZEPPELIN-4823]. exported ipynb file name is undefined

(cherry picked from commit 0b1df00)
Signed-off-by: Jeff Zhang <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants