Skip to content

Conversation

@ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Aug 18, 2016

What is this PR for?

Some HashSet is declared without types. Fix it in NotebookRestApi

What type of PR is it?

Refactoring

Todos

What is the Jira issue?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1162

How should this be tested?

All existing test cases related to permissions

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Questions:

  • Does the licenses files need update? No
  • Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
  • Does this needs documentation? No

@ghost ghost closed this Aug 18, 2016
@ghost ghost reopened this Aug 18, 2016
@ghost ghost closed this Aug 19, 2016
@ghost ghost reopened this Aug 19, 2016
@ghost ghost closed this Aug 19, 2016
@ghost ghost reopened this Aug 19, 2016
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Aug 19, 2016

Please review this PR and let me your thoughts in comments

@jongyoul
Copy link
Member

I think it's enough. LGTM

@asfgit asfgit closed this in d5528f0 Aug 22, 2016
public Response putNotePermissions(@PathParam("noteId") String noteId, String req)
throws IOException {
/**
* TODO(jl): Fixed the type of HashSet
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rajarajan-g Should we also need to remove comments here?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you handle it? This PR already is closed.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I have opened another PR for this.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2016
### What is this PR for?
Since ZEPPELIN-1162 (PR #1341) has been solved, we should remove TODO comments correspondingly.

### What type of PR is it?
Minor

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? No
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
* Does this needs documentation? No

Author: Kai Jiang <[email protected]>

Closes #1556 from vectorijk/minor-remove-comments and squashes the following commits:

1e8ce8a [Kai Jiang] remove TODO comments since 1162 has been solved
snaveenp pushed a commit to snaveenp/zeppelin that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2016
### What is this PR for?
Since ZEPPELIN-1162 (PR apache#1341) has been solved, we should remove TODO comments correspondingly.

### What type of PR is it?
Minor

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? No
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
* Does this needs documentation? No

Author: Kai Jiang <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1556 from vectorijk/minor-remove-comments and squashes the following commits:

1e8ce8a [Kai Jiang] remove TODO comments since 1162 has been solved
darionyaphet pushed a commit to darionyaphet/zeppelin that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2016
### What is this PR for?
Since ZEPPELIN-1162 (PR apache#1341) has been solved, we should remove TODO comments correspondingly.

### What type of PR is it?
Minor

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? No
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
* Does this needs documentation? No

Author: Kai Jiang <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1556 from vectorijk/minor-remove-comments and squashes the following commits:

1e8ce8a [Kai Jiang] remove TODO comments since 1162 has been solved
pedrozatta pushed a commit to pedrozatta/zeppelin that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2016
### What is this PR for?
Since ZEPPELIN-1162 (PR apache#1341) has been solved, we should remove TODO comments correspondingly.

### What type of PR is it?
Minor

### Questions:
* Does the licenses files need update? No
* Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
* Does this needs documentation? No

Author: Kai Jiang <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1556 from vectorijk/minor-remove-comments and squashes the following commits:

1e8ce8a [Kai Jiang] remove TODO comments since 1162 has been solved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants