Skip to content

Conversation

@belugabehr
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@belugabehr
Copy link
Contributor Author

How do we update the build system to call out to this new spot bugs?

@abstractdog
Copy link
Contributor

abstractdog commented Feb 11, 2021

I think the error is because currently, we don't use a Jenkinsfile in the repo, but tez-multibranch job (link) has the --findbugs-strict-precheck flag, which is not handled then(once we'll have Jenkinsfile we can handle this in it). I believe I can remove that temporarily in the jenkins job configuration while having this tested, is it the proper way to do @jteagles ?

UPDATE: I commented out, could you retry @belugabehr ?

@jteagles
Copy link
Contributor

There is a Jenkins file in progress as a PR submission that I haven't had time to verify. If anyone has time to try this out, it may help with better integration with Yetus.
https://github.com/aw-was-here/tez/commit/bead3a21e68ecf4a75d64d8c08b9f8fa0f98cf51

@abstractdog
Copy link
Contributor

@jteagles : I was already looking at that patch, looks good, I'm about to adopt it piece-by-piece

@abstractdog
Copy link
Contributor

@belugabehr, please rebase this PR as TEZ-4290 is merged, you might have minimal conflicts with that in Dockerfile

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

(!) A patch to the testing environment has been detected.
Re-executing against the patched versions to perform further tests.
The console is at https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-108/2/console in case of problems.

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 0s Docker mode activated.
-1 ❌ docker 0m 0s Docker failed to build yetus/tez:f88aa6f21.
Subsystem Report/Notes
GITHUB PR #108
JIRA Issue TEZ-4287
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-108/2/console
versions git=2.17.1
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

(!) A patch to the testing environment has been detected.
Re-executing against the patched versions to perform further tests.
The console is at https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-108/3/console in case of problems.

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 2m 5s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 shelldocs 0m 0s Shelldocs was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ master Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 5m 56s Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚 mvninstall 7m 59s master passed
+1 💚 compile 3m 50s master passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.10+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚 compile 3m 30s master passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_282-8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04-b08
+1 💚 javadoc 3m 46s master passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.10+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚 javadoc 3m 14s master passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_282-8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04-b08
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗 mvndep 0m 17s Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 52s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 3m 52s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.10+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚 javac 3m 52s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 3m 30s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_282-8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04-b08
+1 💚 javac 3m 30s the patch passed
+1 💚 hadolint 0m 2s There were no new hadolint issues.
+1 💚 shellcheck 0m 4s There were no new shellcheck issues.
+1 💚 whitespace 0m 0s The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚 xml 0m 5s The patch has no ill-formed XML file.
+1 💚 javadoc 3m 41s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.10+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04
+1 💚 javadoc 3m 13s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_282-8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04-b08
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 2m 9s tez-api in the patch passed.
+1 💚 unit 0m 46s tez-runtime-internals in the patch passed.
+1 💚 unit 4m 26s tez-dag in the patch passed.
+1 💚 unit 73m 30s root in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 1m 56s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
134m 10s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-108/3/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #108
JIRA Issue TEZ-4287
Optional Tests dupname asflicense hadolint shellcheck shelldocs javac javadoc unit xml compile
uname Linux 3bfaccb2f61f 4.15.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 6 11:12:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality personality/tez.sh
git revision master / 2fefe4a
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_282-8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04-b08
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.10+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_282-8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04-b08
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-108/3/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 1688 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: tez-api tez-runtime-internals tez-dag . U: .
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-108/3/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 shellcheck=0.7.1 hadolint=1.18.0-0-g76eee5c
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@belugabehr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abstractdog Hey, can you please take a look at this PR once more? Thanks!

@abstractdog
Copy link
Contributor

@belugabehr: could you please refresh/rebase this PR? considering that Jenkinsfile and github integration is working for a long time, we can retry this initiative

@maheshrajus
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @belugabehr @mark-bathori
I am working for tez upgrade to jdk17. For this we need to replace findbugs with spotbugs.
I can see you both raised PR [https://github.com//pull/108] [https://github.com//pull/188] already and they are open from long back. Can i take it up and start working on it ?
Thanks !
cc: @abstractdog @ayushtkn

@belugabehr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@maheshrajus , by all means. Thanks for picking this up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants