fix(dataset): Obscure error message on creation

[justinpark]

SUMMARY

Following up #25669 and #24969
This commit adds the SupersetSecurityException case that displays the error message from the statement validation error.
(When a SupersetSecurityException error is thrown while creating a dataset, it only shows "Fater Error" error message.)

BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF

Before:

After:

TESTING INSTRUCTIONS

Go to SQL Lab and create an invalid select statement ((SELECT 1) with parentheses)
Create a dataset and see the error message

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

• Has associated issue:
• Required feature flags:
• Changes UI
• Includes DB Migration (follow approval process in SIP-59)
  • Migration is atomic, supports rollback & is backwards-compatible
  • Confirm DB migration upgrade and downgrade tested
  • Runtime estimates and downtime expectations provided
• Introduces new feature or API
• Removes existing feature or API

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 64.88%. Comparing base (76d897e) to head (5bf2bcd).
Report is 443 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
superset/commands/dataset/exceptions.py	66.66%	3 Missing ⚠️
superset/utils/decorators.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #29554      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   60.48%   64.88%   +4.39%     
==========================================
  Files        1931      524    -1407     
  Lines       76236    37779   -38457     
  Branches     8568        0    -8568     
==========================================
- Hits        46114    24513   -21601     
+ Misses      28017    13266   -14751     
+ Partials     2105        0    -2105     

Flag	Coverage Δ
hive	49.13% <66.66%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
javascript	?
presto	53.71% <66.66%> (-0.09%)	⬇️
python	64.88% <66.66%> (+1.39%)	⬆️
unit	59.73% <66.66%> (+2.11%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rusackas]

@justinpark do you still intend to merge this one?

[rusackas]

Hi @justinpark! Just following up on this one too - still on your radar? Let us know if you'd like to move forward with it or if we should close it out.